Hi,
I feel more comfortable (efficient) using texinfo format for
referencing. Does anybody have any pointers for a good common lisp
reference material in texinfo format?
For example, I quite like CLTL, is there one formatted in texinfo? Many
thanks.
Leo
--
Leo's Emacs uptime: 1 day, 22 hours, 6 minutes, 31 seconds
Leo <·······@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I feel more comfortable (efficient) using texinfo format for
> referencing. Does anybody have any pointers for a good common lisp
> reference material in texinfo format?
>
> For example, I quite like CLTL, is there one formatted in texinfo? Many
> thanks.
http://www.phys.au.dk/~harder/dpans.html is one way to get what you
want.
Zach
On 2009-06-12 13:16 +0100, Zach Beane wrote:
>> I feel more comfortable (efficient) using texinfo format for
>> referencing. Does anybody have any pointers for a good common lisp
>> reference material in texinfo format?
>>
>> For example, I quite like CLTL, is there one formatted in texinfo? Many
>> thanks.
>
> http://www.phys.au.dk/~harder/dpans.html is one way to get what you
> want.
Many thanks. I have gotten this from google ;)
Judging from the response, it looks like there's not much recourses for
texinfo formatted documentation. -- Leo
--
Leo's Emacs uptime: 4 days, 6 hours, 38 minutes, 6 seconds
On Jun 12, 2:50 pm, Leo <·······@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I feel more comfortable (efficient) using texinfo format for
> referencing. Does anybody have any pointers for a good common lisp
> reference material in texinfo format?
>
> For example, I quite like CLTL, is there one formatted in texinfo? Many
> thanks.
>
> Leo
>
> --
> Leo's Emacs uptime: 1 day, 22 hours, 6 minutes, 31 seconds
Here it is: http://bc.tech.coop/blog/031002.html
Best regards,
Vsevolod
On 2009-06-14 22:34 +0100, Vsevolod Dyomkin wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2:50 pm, Leo <·······@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I feel more comfortable (efficient) using texinfo format for
>
>> referencing. Does anybody have any pointers for a good common lisp
>> reference material in texinfo format?
>>
>> For example, I quite like CLTL, is there one formatted in texinfo? Many
>> thanks.
>>
>> Leo
>>
>> --
>> Leo's Emacs uptime: 1 day, 22 hours, 6 minutes, 31 seconds
>
> Here it is: http://bc.tech.coop/blog/031002.html
In case I miss something, only the gcl doc is in info format, right?
> Best regards,
> Vsevolod
--
Leo's Emacs uptime: 4 days, 8 hours, 47 minutes, 58 seconds
On Jun 15, 1:38 am, Leo <·······@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-06-14 22:34 +0100, Vsevolod Dyomkin wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 2:50 pm, Leo <·······@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I feel more comfortable (efficient) using texinfo format for
>
> >> referencing. Does anybody have any pointers for a good common lisp
> >> reference material in texinfo format?
>
> >> For example, I quite like CLTL, is there one formatted in texinfo? Many
> >> thanks.
>
> >> Leo
>
> >> --
> >> Leo's Emacs uptime: 1 day, 22 hours, 6 minutes, 31 seconds
>
> > Here it is:http://bc.tech.coop/blog/031002.html
>
> In case I miss something, only the gcl doc is in info format, right?
AFAIK, gcl = GNU Common Lisp.
But the doc is a Hyperspec (or rather CLTl2, I don't remember for
sure).
On 2009-06-15 05:05 +0100, Vsevolod Dyomkin wrote:
> AFAIK, gcl = GNU Common Lisp. But the doc is a Hyperspec (or rather
> CLTl2, I don't remember for sure).
That's the hyperspec.
--
Leo's Emacs uptime: 5 days, 2 hours, 6 minutes, 22 seconds