From: Keith
Subject: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:33:57 +0000
Message-ID: <ln64jlxelr.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>

Is it safe to get the address of a va_list function parameter?

Keith

• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter? Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter? jameskuyper

From: Thomas A. Russ
Subject: Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:05:22 +0000
Message-ID: <ymik587lzx9.fsf@blackcat.isi.edu>

Keith <··@spam.thanks> writes:

> Is it safe to get the address of a va_list function parameter?

Um, looks like this missed the target newsgroup, since follow-ups were
set to comp.lang.c

(Unless it was an attempt to start a cross-newsgroup flame war....)

-- 
Thomas A. Russ,  USC/Information Sciences Institute

From: jameskuyper
Subject: Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:22:24 +0000
Message-ID: <39d3a7c6-3783-4bbd-b8c5-af812350b253@v13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>

Thomas A. Russ wrote:
> Keith <··@spam.thanks> writes:
>
> > Is it safe to get the address of a va_list function parameter?
>
> Um, looks like this missed the target newsgroup, since follow-ups were
> set to comp.lang.c
>
> (Unless it was an attempt to start a cross-newsgroup flame war....)

What it is a part of a deliberate campaign of posting provocative
messages to a wide variety of groups with follow-ups redirected to
comp.lang.c, with the deliberate intent to disrupt comp.lang.c.
Be careful what messages you respond to.