From: Raffael Cavallaro
Subject: Re: How useful is "trace"
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:29:42 +0000
Message-ID: <55fbbed8-da4a-4c72-96f9-468fa0c7b582@e18g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>

On Apr 15, 7:26 pm, Raffael Cavallaro <················@gmail.com>
wrote:

>   (if (< n 3) (return-from fibonacci)

should be (< n 2) of course :(

• Re: How useful is "trace" gugamilare
  • Re: How useful is "trace" Raffael Cavallaro

From: gugamilare
Subject: Re: How useful is "trace"
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:08:14 +0000
Message-ID: <3e4ec8d2-4493-47ee-a06c-e403ad440fbd@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>

On 15 abr, 20:29, Raffael Cavallaro <················@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 15, 7:26 pm, Raffael Cavallaro <················@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >   (if (< n 3) (return-from fibonacci)
>
> should be (< n 2) of course :(

and (return-from fibonacci 1)

From: Raffael Cavallaro
Subject: Re: How useful is "trace"
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:55:16 +0000
Message-ID: <5a728ebb-7dfa-4f17-8228-7d620db26070@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>

On Apr 15, 8:08 pm, gugamilare <··········@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 abr, 20:29, Raffael Cavallaro <················@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 15, 7:26 pm, Raffael Cavallaro <················@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >   (if (< n 3) (return-from fibonacci)
>
> > should be (< n 2) of course :(
>
> and (return-from fibonacci 1)

actually not really, since this version is not functional - it prints
the values as a side effect rather than returning them.