On Sep 22, 8:40 am, "Alex Mizrahi" <········@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
> g> uses some prevayer concepts too
> g> wow!
> g>http://labs.core.gen.tr/#databaseprogramming
>
> is it better than UCW?
apparently it is
it more like happs
prevayler like....
g>>> uses some prevayer concepts too
g>>> wow!
g>>> http://labs.core.gen.tr/#databaseprogramming
??>>
??>> is it better than UCW?
g> apparently it is
can you elaborate how exactly it is different?
what i see is same "ubercool" continuations promises.
plus ajax stuff -- but there is enough ajax in ucw+ and ucw_ajax
branches.
g> prevayler like....
UCW does not dictate database choice so you can use prevalence with it too.
however, i won't call "prevayler" a database -- it's more like lack of
thereof, that is
-- you have to make one yourself, and prevayler is more like constraints to
your
code that make transactions serializable.
while i agree with the idea of prevalence in general -- most databases can
be
kept in RAM for better performance -- i think it is actually good to have a
database,
that has object definition language, automatically builds indices, supports
queries etc.
is there a layer on top of prevalence to have this, or it leaves you with
bare lisp
definitions?
On Sep 23, 3:53 am, "Alex Mizrahi" <········@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
> g>>> uses some prevayer concepts too
> g>>> wow!
> g>>>http://labs.core.gen.tr/#databaseprogramming
> ??>>
> ??>> is it better than UCW?
>
> g> apparently it is
>
> can you elaborate how exactly it is different?
> what i see is same "ubercool" continuations promises.
> plus ajax stuff -- but there is enough ajax in ucw+ and ucw_ajax
> branches.
Asking gavino for actual technical expertise is pointless. He is
clearly a dilletante more interested in provoking "discussion" based
on nothing more than buzzwords linked together, with no more
understanding than can be produced by 5 minutes of web surfing. He
does not actually use (or want to use) technology, he just blathers
about it.
················@gmail.com" <············@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sep 23, 3:53�am, "Alex Mizrahi" <········@users.sourceforge.net>
> wrote:
>> � g>>> uses some prevayer concepts too
>> � g>>> wow!
>> � g>>>http://labs.core.gen.tr/#databaseprogramming
>> �??>>
>> �??>> is it better than UCW?
>>
>> �g> apparently it is
>>
>> can you elaborate how exactly it is different?
>> what i see is same "ubercool" continuations promises.
>> plus ajax stuff -- but there is enough ajax in ucw+ and ucw_ajax
>> branches.
>
> Asking gavino for actual technical expertise is pointless. He is
> clearly a dilletante more interested in provoking "discussion" based
> on nothing more than buzzwords linked together, with no more
> understanding than can be produced by 5 minutes of web surfing.
Not even. If he could understand what can be got by 5 minutes of
web surfing, he wouldn't send half of his posts. But he cannot.
That's why he deserves no mercy.
People can learn. gavino cannot.
> He does not actually use (or want to use) technology, he just blathers
> about it.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__
jg> Asking gavino for actual technical expertise is pointless. He is
jg> clearly a dilletante more interested in provoking "discussion" based
jg> on nothing more than buzzwords linked together, with no more
jg> understanding than can be produced by 5 minutes of web surfing. He
jg> does not actually use (or want to use) technology, he just blathers
jg> about it.
yep, i know, it's just interesting what made him distinguish coreserver
from dozen or so other Lisp frameworks. do they have some better
buzzwords?