From: Alex Mizrahi
Subject: lisp debugging
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:18:20 +0000
Message-ID: <48ca5007$0$90267$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

in theory it sort of works, but sometimes, in some implementations at least, 
it is quite weird. i mean:

  0: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD NO-APPLICABLE-METHOD (T))
      #<unavailable argument>
      #<unavailable argument>
      #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION PS-PARENTS-OF (1)>)
  1: ((LAMBDA (SB-PCL::.ARG0. SB-INT:&MORE #1="#<...>" . #1#))
      #<unavailable argument>
      #<unavailable argument>
      #<unavailable argument>)

SB-INT:&MORE, huh? signal to noise ratio is surprisingly low.
i wonder if people find this sort of normal.

btw, what's interesting, debugging C/C++ is often much less messy -- despite 
it's lower-level language..