> On Nov 25, 5:42 pm, Xah Lee <······@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/http://code.google.com/p/ejacs/
>> WOW, this is hot!!!
No it isn't, it's useless, as anyone that reads beyond the first
sentences finds out.
-------------------------------------------------------
Limitations and Caveats
Ejacs is basically a toy. It is regrettably insufficient in several
important dimensions, including:
Integration: Ejacs does not yet provide any integration with Emacs
...
-------------------------------------------------------
It's little more than a nice js mode for emacs, which is exactly what
Steve did next. When that was done, he dumped ejacs on the discard
pile @ google.
Try considering the number of lines of code involved to what was
achieved.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
GP lisper <········@CloudDancer.com> writes:
>> On Nov 25, 5:42 pm, Xah Lee <······@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/http://code.google.com/p/ejacs/
>>> WOW, this is hot!!!
>
> No it isn't, it's useless, as anyone that reads beyond the first
> sentences finds out.
It's reasonably interesting, though.
I may be biased - I've been wrestling trying to implement a JS
interpreter in Common Lisp.
--
Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/