Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article <··············@unnamed.xach.com>,
> Zach Beane <····@xach.com> wrote:
>
>> Numeromancer <·······@sbcglobal.net> writes:
>>
>>> I know most readers of the code will expect to find all exported
>>> symbols in defpackage, but that can be fixed with a comment.
>> What would you fix? The expectation of finding all exported symbols in
>> one place, or the absence of a list of exported symbols? I wouldn't
>> find the former very satisfying, and the latter would be the same
>> amount of work as actually maintaining the export list in the
>> defpackage form.
>
> I think he means a comment like this:
>
> (defpackage ...
> ;; No :EXPORT, using DEFUN-EXPORT instead
> ...
> )
>
Yes, that is what I meant. Something to tell the reader that there are symbols
exported from this package, they just aren't listed here.
Tim S