From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
Subject: Re: how shall i respond to discussions on emacs modernization?
Date: 
Message-ID: <1217225533.8646.7.camel@blackbox>
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:45 -0700, namekuseijin wrote:
> Still pushing your ideas of emacs modernization on emaccers, Xah?
> That won't do you any good.  You know it's a relique from the past and
> that concepts such as tabs instead of buffers, windows-like
> keybindings, graphical dialog boxes for common settings and the like
> will not make the old-tarts, software archeologists and nerdy
> masochists feel at home.
> 
> Calm down and go watch some porn.  Then have a look at SciTe or Notepad
> ++ for modern full-featured text-editors...

Modern, eh? Can these do what, say, Slime does?

  http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/
  http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/doc/html/


.. I didn't think so .. .. :)

-- 
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://nostdal.org/
From: namekuseijin
Subject: Re: how shall i respond to discussions on emacs modernization?
Date: 
Message-ID: <d041cd55-392b-4362-9bc1-b3572376fb0c@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
On 28 jul, 03:12, Lars Rune Nøstdal <···········@gmail.com> wrote:
> Modern, eh? Can these do what, say, Slime does?

Well, emacs is a relique and is indeed useful for dealing with
reliques from the same era. ;)

Besides, Slime is using it mostly the facilities of emacs the OS.
Port it to a modern OS. :)