From: gavino
Subject: lisp prevalence layer
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:54:30 +0000
Message-ID: <1aea398b-cbbf-4cb9-89fb-3d6ea5f3f26a@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>

did anyone ever achieve a working lisp prevalence layer?

• Re: lisp prevalence layer Pascal Costanza
  • Re: lisp prevalence layer Andrew Reilly
    • Re: lisp prevalence layer Alex Mizrahi
    • Re: lisp prevalence layer Sacha

From: Pascal Costanza
Subject: Re: lisp prevalence layer
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:37:37 +0000
Message-ID: <6e32e1F54es9U1@mid.individual.net>

gavino wrote:
> did anyone ever achieve a working lisp prevalence layer?

http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=lisp+prevalence+layer

-- 
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/

From: Andrew Reilly
Subject: Re: lisp prevalence layer
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:02:52 +0000
Message-ID: <6e33tbF51semU1@mid.individual.net>

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:37:37 +0200, Pascal Costanza wrote:

> gavino wrote:
>> did anyone ever achieve a working lisp prevalence layer?
> 
> http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=lisp+prevalence+layer

That's amusingly circular...  For me, Google rejected the redirect from 
justfuckinggooglit, so I entered the query myself, and the top it was 
this one...
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/
thread/375662f0a87527fe

Which is this thread...



-- 
Andrew

From: Alex Mizrahi
Subject: Re: lisp prevalence layer
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:25:33 +0000
Message-ID: <487ca554$0$90273$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

??>> 
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=lisp+prevalence+layer

 AR> That's amusingly circular...

if gavino just fucking googled it instead of asking here, first link (now 
second) would be:

 http://homepage.mac.com/svc/prevalence/readme.html

which points to the right page: 
http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-prevalence/

(this page itself is not showed in results because it does not have word 
"layer" in it,
and indeed most people do not call it layer..) 

From: Sacha
Subject: Re: lisp prevalence layer
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:52:41 +0000
Message-ID: <eJ3fk.7641$5A2.5587@newsfe29.ams2>

Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:37:37 +0200, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> 
>> gavino wrote:
>>> did anyone ever achieve a working lisp prevalence layer?
>> http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=lisp+prevalence+layer
> 
> That's amusingly circular...  For me, Google rejected the redirect from 
> justfuckinggooglit, so I entered the query myself, and the top it was 
> this one...
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/
> thread/375662f0a87527fe

Meta-circular googling ?

Sacha