From: gavino
Subject: lisp v forth
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:36:14 +0000
Message-ID: <f0442fd3-0141-4bc0-9fc3-470e1ec7d4d5@41g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> anyone know both? wana comment? From: Rainer Joswig
Subject: Re: lisp v forth
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:46:24 +0000
Message-ID: <joswig-9E20D5.21462405012008@news-europe.giganews.com> In article
<····································@41g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
gavino <·········@gmail.com> wrote:
> anyone know both? wana comment?
___________________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please don't |
/ O O\__ feed |
/ \ the troll |
/ \ \ |
/ _ \ \ ----------------------
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | __||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | /| | --|
| | |// |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ // |
/ _ \\ _ // | /
* / \_ /- | - | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
--
http://lispm.dyndns.org/ From: gavino
Subject: Re: lisp v forth
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:51:33 +0000
Message-ID: <307d98a3-4724-41d4-8429-eac5e1b63fb7@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com> On Jan 5, 12:46 pm, Rainer Joswig <······@lisp.de> wrote:
> In article
> <····································@41g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
>
> gavino <·········@gmail.com> wrote:
> > anyone know both? wana comment?
>
> ___________________________
> /| /| | |
> ||__|| | Please don't |
> / O O\__ feed |
> / \ the troll |
> / \ \ |
> / _ \ \ ----------------------
> / |\____\ \ ||
> / | | | |\____/ ||
> / \|_|_|/ | __||
> / / \ |____| ||
> / | | /| | --|
> | | |// |____ --|
> * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
> *-- _--\ _ \ // |
> / _ \\ _ // | /
> * / \_ /- | - | |
> * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
>
> --http://lispm.dyndns.org/
stainer ballswig From: Johann Höchtl
Subject: Re: lisp v forth
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:11:06 +0000
Message-ID: <eb330$47809b2c$557faae9$28048@news.inode.at> gavino wrote:
> anyone know both? wana comment?
Actually I am currently investigating both. Where the first impression
shows clearely the difference (Stack based <--> list based, RPN <--> PN)
both languages e.g. share a lot in their domain of application,
especially when someone takes the more advanced implementations of forth
or one of its descendants or dialects.
Anyone took a look at factor? www.factorcode.org
I would be interessted in a closer comparison, as googling didn't
revealed much (though this could also mean stgh.)
Regards,
Johann