From: Terrence Brannon
Subject: Lisp implementations which use a _Python_ compiler?
Date: 
Message-ID: <ced611f3-567d-4993-839c-1f7b8d67cf2c@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Re: http://www.weitz.de/cl-ppcre/#install

I quote: Note that on CL implementations which use the Python compiler
(i.e. CMUCL, SBCL, SCL) you can concatenate the compiled object files
to create one single object file which you can load afterwards

But is that word _Python_ really accurate? Lisp hijacks the Python
compiler?

From: Pillsy
Subject: Re: Lisp implementations which use a _Python_ compiler?
Date: 
Message-ID: <13b0da6b-cb4f-4671-bab8-7c43d41b5db0@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Jan 4, 3:56 pm, Terrence Brannon <········@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> But is that word _Python_ really accurate? Lisp hijacks the Python
> compiler?

The compiler used by CMUCL and its descendants was called "Python"
before Guido van Rossum named his completely unrelated scripting
language.

Cheers,
Pillsy
From: Vassil Nikolov
Subject: Re: Lisp implementations which use a _Python_ compiler?
Date: 
Message-ID: <snwr6gx46v1.fsf@luna.vassil.nikolov.names>
Terrence Brannon <········@gmail.com> writes:

> Re: http://www.weitz.de/cl-ppcre/#install
>
> I quote: Note that on CL implementations which use the Python compiler
> (i.e. CMUCL, SBCL, SCL) you can concatenate the compiled object files
> to create one single object file which you can load afterwards
>
> But is that word _Python_ really accurate? Lisp hijacks the Python
> compiler?

  "Python compiler" is a homonym.  The "Lisp meaning" predates the
  "Python meaning" by a few years.  Compare
  <http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Python+compiler%22+%22Lisp%22> to
  <http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Python+compiler%22>.

  ---Vassil.


-- 
Bound variables, free programmers.