Hello,
The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref:
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_prog1c.htm
Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated:
result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second-
form.
Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis):
prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding
as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*.
I think that the first statement is correct. Correct?
Mirko
In article
<····································@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
·············@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref:
> http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_prog1c.htm
>
> Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated:
>
> result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second-
> form.
>
> Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis):
>
> prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding
> as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*.
>
> I think that the first statement is correct. Correct?
>
> Mirko
See here:
http://www.cliki.net/Proposed%20ANSI%20Revisions%20and%20Clarifications
and here:
http://www.cliki.net/Issue%20PROG2-RETURN-VALUE
--
http://lispm.dyndns.org/
On Aug 21, 10:40 am, Rainer Joswig <······@lisp.de> wrote:
> In article
> <····································@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> ·············@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref:
> >http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_prog1c.htm
>
> > Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated:
>
> > result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second-
> > form.
>
> > Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis):
>
> > prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding
> > as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*.
>
> > I think that the first statement is correct. Correct?
>
> > Mirko
>
> See here:
>
> http://www.cliki.net/Proposed%20ANSI%20Revisions%20and%20Clarifications
>
> and here:
>
> http://www.cliki.net/Issue%20PROG2-RETURN-VALUE
>
> --http://lispm.dyndns.org/
Thanks,
I was not aware of that page.
Mirko