From: iu2
Subject: sbcl and slime
Date: 
Message-ID: <1188815634.076752.222600@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
Hi all,

1. Can slime work with SBCL?

2. I managed using Ltk with CLisp, but not with SBCL. I saw that sbcl
is mentioned in the Ltk code, but that should probably be fine-tuned.
Has someone done it?

Thanks
iu2

From: andrea
Subject: Re: sbcl and slime
Date: 
Message-ID: <1188844885.427276.287500@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
On 3 Set, 12:33, iu2 <·······@elbit.co.il> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 1. Can slime work with SBCL?
>
> 2. I managed using Ltk with CLisp, but not with SBCL. I saw that sbcl
> is mentioned in the Ltk code, but that should probably be fine-tuned.
> Has someone done it?
>
> Thanks
> iu2

I use Emacs + slime + sbcl, and it's really great  ;)
From: Tamas Papp
Subject: Re: sbcl and slime
Date: 
Message-ID: <87ir6st4aq.fsf@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>
iu2 <·······@elbit.co.il> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> 1. Can slime work with SBCL?

Yes, why not?

Tamas
From: Peter Herth
Subject: Re: sbcl and slime
Date: 
Message-ID: <fbhhqk$25f$02$1@news.t-online.com>
iu2 wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 1. Can slime work with SBCL?
> 
> 2. I managed using Ltk with CLisp, but not with SBCL. I saw that sbcl
> is mentioned in the Ltk code, but that should probably be fine-tuned.
> Has someone done it?
> 
> Thanks
> iu2
> 

1. I am using slime with SBCL to
2. develop Ltk, so I guess Ltk and SBCL work well together :)

Peter

-- 
Ltk, the easy lisp gui http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/