From: Tim Bradshaw
Subject: Jon Harrop
Date: 
Message-ID: <f2qcqq$eh4$1$830fa17d@news.demon.co.uk>
Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
but eventually it eats your life.  I find myself hitting refresh to see 
what idiocy he's come up with this time.  May be I'll check back in 
another couple of years.

From: Dan Bensen
Subject: Re: Jon Harrop
Date: 
Message-ID: <f2qlbd$p04$1@wildfire.prairienet.org>
Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
> realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
> but eventually it eats your life.

Maybe we should make him our mascot.
   "Dr. Frog, the Fabulous Flying Amphibian"
Someone could make up some ascii art that tastefully
blends that impressive Hasselhoff shot with the Toad logo.

-- 
Dan
www.prairienet.org/~dsb/
From: ctnd
Subject: Re: Jon Harrop
Date: 
Message-ID: <1183272044.143771.33980@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
On May 21, 12:30 am, Dan Bensen <··········@cyberspace.net> wrote:
> Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> > Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I
> > realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure,
> > but eventually it eats your life.
>
> Maybe we should make him our mascot.
>    "Dr. Frog, the Fabulous Flying Amphibian"
> Someone could make up some ascii art that tastefully
> blends that impressive Hasselhoff shot with the Toad logo.
>
> --
> Danwww.prairienet.org/~dsb/


                       //`'''```,
             o        // LISP   `.,
       ,....OOo.   .c;.',,,.'``.,,.`
    .'      ____.,'.//
   / _____  \___/.'
  | / ||  \\---\|
  ||  ||   \\  ||
  co  co    co co


It's the suave lisp toad. :)
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <YU54i.40$yl.10@newsfe12.lga>
Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
> realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
> but eventually it eats your life.  I find myself hitting refresh to see 
> what idiocy he's come up with this time.  May be I'll check back in 
> another couple of years.
> 

Well I fer one am LMAO as you try to get the monkey off your back.

The thing is that he is viral, wheedling himself into your cortex by 
saying things just a hair off the plate, and by turning a deaf ear on 
any taunts, the kind of thing to which most trolls make the mistake of 
reacting, such that they then get sucked down a black hole of abuse that 
no one cares to respond to except troll-seeking missiles like Naggum or 
Tilton who just suck them deeper and deeper down the flytrap.

Harrop is immune to that, a true master, prevailing only because you all 
are so earnest and decent. He  cloaks himself in the protein signature 
of plausible computerspeak and sails straight past your immune system.

The best part is, knowing this does not help. And this is why g*d 
created killfiles. That drops your exposure to others quoting him. Still 
a challenge. But it puts pressure on the Harrop species that grows 
ineluctably until the species winks out (only to return, for as some 
brilliant wag once observed, "Liars need good memories. Trolls need NG 
readers with bad ones.").

The sad thing is that Harrop is smart enough to be contributing to 
society, but instead is himself addicted to the hits he sees on his web 
site because of his trolling. All I need do to see a hundred-fold jump 
in traffic to my Algebra site is say "new demo pages start <here>". 
Probably search engines feeding off NG posts, but Harrop does not know 
that.

Here is the acid test: I forget who even is doing it, but only when 
/that/ person can resist posting the "do not feed the trolls" banner can 
we expect the harropodemic to ebb.

I do have some methadone here: replies to Harrop's technical stuff must 
be funny, unaggressive, and Lisp-deprecating. Feed a cold, starve a Harrop.

hth, kenneth

ps. Trick #2: Counting a behavior changes it. I am not smart like you 
guys. Can someone write the code to print daily/cumulative totals? The 
columns should be: count contributed to Harrop thread, count direct 
replies to Harrop, count direct replies by Harrop to them, and then a 
weighted sucker-score, with (I think) each of those having increasing 
weight (1-2-4?). (If Harrop responds directly to you, he has sensed a 
fresh blood vein.) Problem. Harrop joins random threads. OK, those are 
not harropthreads, so just count direct replies /to/ harrop (but weight 
those 4).

Other ideas for the Harrop Index welcome. k


-- 
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/

"Algebra is the metaphysics of arithmetic." - John Ray

"As long as algebra is taught in school,
there will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts

"Stand firm in your refusal to remain conscious during algebra."
    - Fran Lebowitz

"I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies make a positive."
    - Tim Allen
From: fireblade
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179744127.766883.302800@x18g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Even when dealing with proven trolls don't forgeth  the rule saying
"Don't be vicious". I wanted to make Xah Lee and Jon Harrop look bad
but at the end I looked bad , at least in my own eyes.

After I checked what he has to offer came to the same  conclusion.
>The sad thing is that Harrop is smart enough to be contributing to
>society, but instead is himself addicted to the hits he sees on his web
>site because of his trolling

That's why a give him a credit and a best free advice I had :
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/68e2aa891dbbf1b4/d0cd2fcac6fd1c40#d0cd2fcac6fd1c40

If you don't like some  troll post a warning sign and ignore him or
just ignore him. Life is to short to waste it on things that just make
you feel bad.

some statistics for comp.lang.lisp :

Top posters
This month
131 ····@ffconsultancy.com
 82 ······@lisp.de
 69 ····@p-cos.net
 51 ······@nhplace.com
 51 ··········@tfeb.org
 51 ··········@cyberspace.net
 47 fireblade
 45 ················@pas-d'espam-s'il-vous-plait-mac.com
 44 Joe Marshall
 37 ····@informatimago.com

I would give all mine 47 posts for a one really good one.

All time
4127 ······@world.std.com
3769 ·······@nyc.rr.com
2822 ····@naggum.no
2332 ····@cley.com
2065 ········@web.de
2055 ····@naggum.net
1977 ·······@mclink.it
1863 ····@p-cos.net
1833 ····@informatimago.com
1778 ·······@cs.nyu.edu

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/about
From: Tim Bradshaw
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179753114.230691.57920@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On May 21, 11:42 am, fireblade <·················@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you don't like some  troll post a warning sign and ignore him or
> just ignore him. Life is to short to waste it on things that just make
> you feel bad.

Ah, that's not the problem.  The problem is that I *enjoy* bating
trolls, but I suspect it's good neither for me (I could be skiing) nor
cll (you could be discussing Lisp). Harrop is, I admit, a particularly
difficult specimen - normally their heads have come entirely off by
this stage - but that just adds to the challenge.  Which must be
resisted, I think.

--tim
From: fireblade
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179755049.108308.227460@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
On May 21, 3:11 pm, Tim Bradshaw <··········@tfeb.org> wrote:
> On May 21, 11:42 am, fireblade <·················@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you don't like some  troll post a warning sign and ignore him or
> > just ignore him. Life is to short to waste it on things that just make
> > you feel bad.
>
> Ah, that's not the problem.  The problem is that I *enjoy* bating
> trolls, but I suspect it's good neither for me (I could be skiing) nor
> cll (you could be discussing Lisp). Harrop is, I admit, a particularly
> difficult specimen - normally their heads have come entirely off by
> this stage - but that just adds to the challenge.  Which must be
> resisted, I think.
>
> --tim

I coudn't agree more but Rainer is right we should rather do lisping
or something usefull.
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <vog4i.11$cp7.7@newsfe12.lga>
fireblade wrote:
> Even when dealing with proven trolls don't forgeth  the rule saying
> "Don't be vicious". I wanted to make Xah Lee and Jon Harrop look bad
> but at the end I looked bad , at least in my own eyes.
> 
> After I checked what he has to offer came to the same  conclusion.

Pull yourself together, man!

> 
>>The sad thing is that Harrop is smart enough to be contributing to
>>society, but instead is himself addicted to the hits he sees on his web
>>site because of his trolling
> 
> 
> That's why a give him a credit and a best free advice I had :
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/68e2aa891dbbf1b4/d0cd2fcac6fd1c40#d0cd2fcac6fd1c40
> 
> If you don't like some  troll post a warning sign and ignore him or
> just ignore him. Life is to short to waste it on things that just make
> you feel bad.

It is the mouse that feels bad, not the cat playing with it.

> 
> some statistics for comp.lang.lisp :
> 
> Top posters
> This month
> 131 ····@ffconsultancy.com
>  82 ······@lisp.de
>  69 ····@p-cos.net
>  51 ······@nhplace.com
>  51 ··········@tfeb.org
>  51 ··········@cyberspace.net
>  47 fireblade
>  45 ················@pas-d'espam-s'il-vous-plait-mac.com
>  44 Joe Marshall
>  37 ····@informatimago.com
> 
> I would give all mine 47 posts for a one really good one.

I feel the same about George Bush's thoughts.

> 
> All time
> 4127 ······@world.std.com
> 3769 ·······@nyc.rr.com

Now I see why Kent came out of retirement.

I feel like Barry Bonds chasing Babe Ruth.

Thank god they go by count and not redeeming social value.

I'll be here all week, don't forget your bartenders.

kt
From: ······@math.purdue.edu
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179868855.338007.190920@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
On May 21, 8:36 am, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> fireblade wrote:
> > some statistics for comp.lang.lisp :
>
> > Top posters
>
> > All time
> > 4127 ······@world.std.com
> > 3769 ·······@nyc.rr.com
>
> Now I see why Kent came out of retirement.
>
> I feel like Barry Bonds chasing Babe Ruth.

Kenny, Kenny, did you read the statistics correctly?  Did you notice

2822 ····@naggum.no
2055 ····@naggum.net

??? You and Kent are just two guys competing for second!

Brad

PS:  Bonds is chasing Hank Aaron.
From: Rob St. Amant
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <f2vnrf$6gt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
······@math.purdue.edu writes:

> On May 21, 8:36 am, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
>> fireblade wrote:
>> > some statistics for comp.lang.lisp :
>>
>> > Top posters
>>
>> > All time
>> > 4127 ······@world.std.com
>> > 3769 ·······@nyc.rr.com
>>
>> Now I see why Kent came out of retirement.
>>
>> I feel like Barry Bonds chasing Babe Ruth.
>
> Kenny, Kenny, did you read the statistics correctly?  Did you notice
>
> 2822 ····@naggum.no
> 2055 ····@naggum.net
>
> ??? You and Kent are just two guys competing for second!
>
> Brad
>
> PS:  Bonds is chasing Hank Aaron.

PPS: If Ken's programming productivity is due to steroids, I'd like to
know who his supplier is.
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <VfK4i.14$9%.1@newsfe12.lga>
······@math.purdue.edu wrote:
> On May 21, 8:36 am, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> 
>>fireblade wrote:
>>
>>>some statistics for comp.lang.lisp :
>>
>>>Top posters
>>
>>>All time
>>>4127 ······@world.std.com
>>>3769 ·······@nyc.rr.com
>>
>>Now I see why Kent came out of retirement.
>>
>>I feel like Barry Bonds chasing Babe Ruth.
> 
> 
> Kenny, Kenny, did you read the statistics correctly?  Did you notice
> 
> 2822 ····@naggum.no
> 2055 ····@naggum.net
> 
> ??? You and Kent are just two guys competing for second!

Brad, precision is the enemy of humor!

And I have not been at nyc.rr.com in a year!

That's OK, no way I oculd hold off Harrop anyway. :(

> 
> Brad
> 
> PS:  Bonds is chasing Hank Aaron.
> 

Doh!

kt

-- 
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/

"Algebra is the metaphysics of arithmetic." - John Ray

"As long as algebra is taught in school,
there will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts

"Stand firm in your refusal to remain conscious during algebra."
    - Fran Lebowitz

"I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies make a positive."
    - Tim Allen
From: Damien Kick
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <Fyv4i.17888$3P3.4831@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Ken Tilton wrote:
> The best part is, knowing this does not help. And this is why g*d 
> created killfiles. That drops your exposure to others quoting him. Still 
> a challenge. But it puts pressure on the Harrop species that grows 
> ineluctably until the species winks out (only to return, for as some 
> brilliant wag once observed, "Liars need good memories. Trolls need NG 
> readers with bad ones.").

Too bad that newsreader clients and their kill-files haven't been 
getting as much attention as e-mail clients and their spam filters.

> ps. Trick #2: Counting a behavior changes it. I am not smart like you 
> guys. Can someone write the code to print daily/cumulative totals? The 
> columns should be: count contributed to Harrop thread, count direct 
> replies to Harrop, count direct replies by Harrop to them, and then a 
> weighted sucker-score, with (I think) each of those having increasing 
> weight (1-2-4?). (If Harrop responds directly to you, he has sensed a 
> fresh blood vein.) Problem. Harrop joins random threads. OK, those are 
> not harropthreads, so just count direct replies /to/ harrop (but weight 
> those 4).
> 
> Other ideas for the Harrop Index welcome. k

I'd be willing to contribute money to an effort to implement a 
newsreader with a Harrop-index kill-file filter.  It would have to use 
the concept of a Harrop-index to sort signal from noise.  Extra points 
would, of course, go to anyone implementing this Harrop-killer app in 
OCaml or even F# itself.  Super extra points if it escorted Harrop to 
/dev/null faster than a competing lisp implementation.  "I just blew 
your mind" extra points if Harrop himself were to write it.  Of course, 
one would have to generalize it so that it would be useful for 
*plonk*ing other trolls on the head, too.

<pause>

I suppose it would also be good to integrate something like this with 
other chaff threshing techniques.  Many-to-many communication networks 
which include some kind of user ranking system come to mind.  Of course, 
this would probably be just another factor in calculating the Harrop-index.

Kenny, your a genius!  Now just whip one up with Cells somehow.  Or get 
the Open Source Fairy to do it.  Or maybe Tim Bradshaw can write a lisp 
version in all the free time he gains from not wasting time on usenet. 
Then, we bet Harrop that he can't write one of these here new fangled 
things in OCaml and do a better job at it than this super awesome lisp 
version.  I'd do it in all the free time I have from flirting with 
insomnia but I'm lazy and stupid, not like that clever Harrop.  I bet he 
could write one before any of our lisp ray tracers finished rendering a 
simple gray scale image.
From: Xah Lee
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179856427.754157.266830@y18g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Tech Geekers versus Spammers

Xah Lee, 2002-08

Recall that Spy vs Spy was a popular comic by Antonio Prohias that
appears in Mad magazine.

Here's a few snap shots:
spy vs spy spy vs spy spy vs spy

The theme being two archenemic spies, colored one white and one black,
who better each other on schemes and technologies. One creates a voice-
recognition missile, then the other invents a voice-exchanging device.
The final frame of the comic would have the second spy shrieking with
mirth and a victory pose over the mishaps of the other. Turn to the
next installment and the winner & loser are reversed: We see one spy
excitedly plans a booby trap. When he enters the other spy's house to
install the bomb, he got blown up because the other spy has spied on
his scheme. Again the hilariously smug victory pose over the
misfortune of the other.

Their fight is endless. Over and over we read with glee over the silly
stratagems and incredible technologies they devices that befall on
themselves.

As i sit here and read the technology geeking morons fighting with
spammers.

2006
The Worsening of Email Spams

The tech geekers, due to utter ignorance of sociology and power-
struggling nature of males, have long been fighting with the spammer
in the very beginning, by tech battle. That is, the tech geekers
device technological ways to defeat spammers, while, the spammers, do
exactly the same: they use more technology to thwart the tech geeker's
ruse. (e.g. tech geekers have black lists, honey pots, web email-
harvesting traps, bayesian filtering et al, while the spammers have
email havesters, spam farm, forged header, et al.) Long story short,
in mid 1990s spam is just a annoyance that accounts perhaps 1% of
email traffic, but today it is 90% of email traffic, and i'm getting
tens of spams in my inbox per day, most of which are either entirely
image based or have lots of Joe-Bloke rube texts that are very
difficult to distinguish from a Joe-Bloke email. (in my spam mail box,
i actually receive literally thousands of spams per day, and since
about 2004, i started to lose real emails because of spam.
Newsgroup Noise

Now, let's consider newsgroups. Every tech geeker knows about
newsgroups. Now, newsgroups softwares have “kill file” feature from
the very early beginning. Newsgroups have been around for what, 20
years? With each generation of newsgroup clients, the kill-file
feature or otherwise various mark-up mark-down features get better and
better all the time. But has any of these features abated the so-
called “trolls” or “noise” in newsgroups? or, have they reduced or
eased the fights and hostilities in newsgroups? Frankly, the noises,
fights, troll-cryings only increased and in fact today you can not go
by passing a few days without hearing a troll cry or fight broke out.
What is wrong? Again, due to the tech geeker's total ignorance in
sociology, they perceived wrong problems, and their actions only
exacerbated the situation.

----
This post is archived at:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/tech_geekers_vs_spammers.html

  Xah
  ···@xahlee.org
∑ http://xahlee.org/
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <GyD4i.5$ed3.3@newsfe12.lga>
Ah, here's the answer, straight from Jon, aka "we":

"We've been looking at data submitted by readers registering interest in 
the F#.NET Journal: ... the next most popular language for people 
wanting to learn F# is Lisp. We found that quite surprising, for one 
because we didn't realise so many people knew Lisp. [PWUAHHHAAA! No, it 
  is too slow, no one knows Lisp.] These guys are probably yearning for 
pattern matching, better performance, .NET interoperability [PWUAHHHAA] 
and the elimination of run-time errors."

Yeah, I am sick to death of run-time errors. What an idiot.

But he does have his fans: "Some people ask me if "Jon Harrop" is an 
alter-ego. I wish he was, since then I'd be a lot smarter than I am :-) 
  [Oh, get your nose out!] We (the F# and all the Microsoft .NET teams) 
can make the language and the framework, but Jon is one of those many 
[PWUAHHAHAHA] users who helps make it sparkle."

Microsoft likes Jon. 'Nuff said? And Jon makes it "sparkle"? The F# team 
cannot? No, we just make the language, haven't a clue what to do with 
it. It is tough having to write that stuff where your Mom might see it.

OK, so surprise-surprise, Jon is just trying to drum up business with a 
lot of intellectual dishonesty, sad way to make a buck, lessee how he is 
doing: raise your hand if Jon has you interested in F#. Fireblade, I 
have you down already.

kt
From: Joe Marshall
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179858164.220306.122350@x18g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On May 22, 7:58 am, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:

> OK, so surprise-surprise, Jon is just trying to drum up business with a
> lot of intellectual dishonesty, sad way to make a buck, lessee how he is
> doing: raise your hand if Jon has you interested in F#.

I'm not sure this counts, but when Jon mentioned F# (the twenty-third
time, he mentioned it, that is), I remembered that I had downloaded it
and looked at it, but that I hadn't deleted it.  Jon renewed my
interest in freeing up that disk space.
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <SCG4i.30$Lk4.18@newsfe12.lga>
Joe Marshall wrote:
> On May 22, 7:58 am, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>OK, so surprise-surprise, Jon is just trying to drum up business with a
>>lot of intellectual dishonesty, sad way to make a buck, lessee how he is
>>doing: raise your hand if Jon has you interested in F#.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure this counts, but when Jon mentioned F# (the twenty-third
> time, he mentioned it, that is), I remembered that I had downloaded it
> and looked at it, but that I hadn't deleted it.  Jon renewed my
> interest in freeing up that disk space.
> 

Unfortunately we square the value before summing, so you count for two.

:)

kt

-- 
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/

"Algebra is the metaphysics of arithmetic." - John Ray

"As long as algebra is taught in school,
there will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts

"Stand firm in your refusal to remain conscious during algebra."
    - Fran Lebowitz

"I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies make a positive."
    - Tim Allen
From: Bob Felts
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1hyirp3.10p6g5t10vsxu2N%wrf3@stablecross.com>
Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:

> raise your hand if Jon has you interested in F#.

I went so far as to download a PowerPoint presentation on F# and looked
at the first couple of slides.  I re-wrote their first example in Lisp.

But I still feel dirty.
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <AAH4i.6721$XU7.1198@newsfe12.lga>
Bob Felts wrote:
> Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>raise your hand if Jon has you interested in F#.
> 
> 
> I went so far as to download a PowerPoint presentation on F# and looked
> at the first couple of slides.  I re-wrote their first example in Lisp.
> 
> But I still feel dirty.
> 

You make three, and I might make four, but I think I looked at F# during 
the excitement over MSatan deciding to support dynamic languages. Ah, 
let's make it four, the poor sod has been working his tail off.

kt

-- 
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/

"Algebra is the metaphysics of arithmetic." - John Ray

"As long as algebra is taught in school,
there will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts

"Stand firm in your refusal to remain conscious during algebra."
    - Fran Lebowitz

"I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies make a positive."
    - Tim Allen
From: Joseph  Coffey
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1183127072.446683.158720@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
F# is not a dynamic language.

On May 22, 12:33 pm, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> Bob Felts wrote:
> > Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>raise your hand if Jon has you interested in F#.
>
> > I went so far as to download a PowerPoint presentation on F# and looked
> > at the first couple of slides.  I re-wrote their first example in Lisp.
>
> > But I still feel dirty.
>
> You make three, and I might make four, but I think I looked at F# during
> the excitement over MSatan deciding to support dynamic languages. Ah,
> let's make it four, the poor sod has been working his tail off.
>
> kt
>
> --http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
>
> "Algebra is the metaphysics of arithmetic." - John Ray
>
> "As long as algebra is taught in school,
> there will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts
>
> "Stand firm in your refusal to remain conscious during algebra."
>     - Fran Lebowitz
>
> "I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies make a positive."
>     - Tim Allen
From: Jon Harrop
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <46853e85$0$8713$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Joseph  Coffey wrote:
> F# is not a dynamic language.

F# supports reflection and run-time typing.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The OCaml Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?usenet
From: Pascal Costanza
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <5el80iF38jpa4U1@mid.individual.net>
Jon Harrop wrote:
> Joseph  Coffey wrote:
>> F# is not a dynamic language.
> 
> F# supports reflection [...]

...probably not.


Pascal

-- 
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
From: Jon Harrop
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <4686f250$0$8748$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>> Joseph  Coffey wrote:
>>> F# is not a dynamic language.
>> 
>> F# supports reflection [...]
> 
> ...probably not.

?

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The OCaml Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?usenet
From: Daniel Barlow
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <1183250745.4044.1@proxy01.news.clara.net>
Jon Harrop wrote:
> Pascal Costanza wrote:
>> Jon Harrop wrote:
>>> Joseph  Coffey wrote:
>>>> F# is not a dynamic language.
>>> F# supports reflection [...]
>> ...probably not.
> 
> ?
> 

If you accept the notion that "languages shape the way we think", this 
follows trivially from the observation that F#'s users appear to have no 
reflective or introspective capability at all ...


-dan
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <LUEhi.24$qw6.18@newsfe12.lga>
Daniel Barlow wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
> 
>> Pascal Costanza wrote:
>>
>>> Jon Harrop wrote:
>>>
>>>> Joseph  Coffey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> F# is not a dynamic language.
>>>>
>>>> F# supports reflection [...]
>>>
>>> ...probably not.
>>
>>
>> ?
>>
> 
> If you accept the notion that "languages shape the way we think", this 
> follows trivially from the observation that F#'s users appear to have no 
> reflective or introspective capability at all ...

Yes, Jon's reflective moments involve funhouse mirrors that make him 
look clever, not pathetic. Perhaps it is time we c.l.l savages stop 
toying with him. Garret should remain our preferred chew toy. Harrop has 
descended now into the same behavior pattern that once got him beat up 
in the school yard, trading bruises for the sad satisfaction of simply 
annoying others, and it is too sad to see. All he has left is his desire 
to irritate, and now even that does not work because it is so obvious. 
Sure, dolts like Larry Clapp will do their best to feed him, but Harrop 
will soon weary of the monotonous diet as even the dumbest c.l.l 
denizens come up to speed. This is a time for compassion, not attack dog 
training.

hth,kt
From: Larry Clapp
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <slrnf8eaa2.ve0.larry@theclapp.ddts.net>
On 2007-07-01, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> Sure, dolts like Larry Clapp will do their best to feed him, but
> Harrop will soon weary of the monotonous diet as even the dumbest
> c.l.l denizens come up to speed.

Color me up to speed.  :)
From: Thomas F. Burdick
Subject: Re: Is F# a dynamic language
Date: 
Message-ID: <1183284695.067533.51330@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
On Jul 1, 5:08 am, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> Yes, Jon's reflective moments involve funhouse mirrors that make him
> look clever, not pathetic. Perhaps it is time we c.l.l savages stop
> toying with him. Garret should remain our preferred chew toy. Harrop has
> descended now into the same behavior pattern that once got him beat up
> in the school yard, trading bruises for the sad satisfaction of simply
> annoying others, and it is too sad to see. All he has left is his desire
> to irritate, and now even that does not work because it is so obvious.

I think of him more as the borderline case on the subway.  The problem
is that one source of noise can easily be ignored; indeed meaningful
conversations among a group of people on the subway often involve
doing just that.  Alas, we're not all urbanites here, and I think
we're seeing a case of the suburban folks not realizing that these
borderline types are the worst, and should be ignored at all cost.
True crazies can be interesting from time to time, but the merely
severely maladjusted almost never.
From: fireblade
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179931696.247490.151420@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
On May 22, 4:58 pm, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> Ah, here's the answer, straight from Jon, aka "we":

[snipped]
> Fireblade, I have you down already.
>
> kt

I don't understand above . For me Jon Harop is interesthing troll that
knows programming  with OCaml ,but  beside that he's a miserable
little  soul. That's too bad considering that he has a potential to
make something interesthing or certainly make more money than trolling
in usenet.

As for myself ,i thought of checking on f#  but I'll skip it beacuse
i'm busy with below  thingies:
1. Learning to use FreeBSD -it's already installed on my desktop and i
have a book with great sense of humor:  Absolute BSD-The Ultimate
Guide to FreeBSD from Michael Lucas
2. Started with Data mining (in lisp as my hobby project ), in the
beginning i'm going to implement WEKA http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/
in lisp.
and finally
3 I get a green for a real commercial project for my employer done in
lisp, it's not big as I expected,  nor very interesthing  but any
foothold for lisp is good.

cheers
bobi
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <6Cc5i.223$tS3.126@newsfe12.lga>
fireblade wrote:
> On May 22, 4:58 pm, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
> 
>>Ah, here's the answer, straight from Jon, aka "we":
> 
> 
> [snipped]
> 
>>Fireblade, I have you down already.
>>
>>kt
> 
> 
> I don't understand above . For me Jon Harop is ...

Gone.

They brought up the house lights and everyone left. The movie is over, 
don't forget your belongings.

hth, kenny
From: Giorgos Keramidas
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index
Date: 
Message-ID: <87hcpoe4xx.fsf@kobe.laptop>
On 23 May 2007 07:48:16 -0700, fireblade <·················@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 22, 4:58 pm, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
>> Ah, here's the answer, straight from Jon, aka "we":
>>
>> Fireblade, I have you down already.
>
> I thought of checking on f# but I'll skip it because I'm busy with
> below thingies:
>
> 1. Learning to use FreeBSD -it's already installed on my desktop and i
> have a book with great sense of humor: Absolute BSD-The Ultimate Guide
> to FreeBSD from Michael Lucas

Nice!  Good choice of an intro book too.  Michael's writing style is
truly marvellous.

We -- the FreeBSD team -- have an extensive and growing online set of
helpful documentation articles and books too.  There's also a thriving
community of people replying user-questions and helping people as they
find their way around FreeBSD, at the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
newsgroup and the `freebsd-questions' mailing list.

[Followup-To set to c.u.b.f.m]

Have fun, welcome to BSD, and all that :-)
From: Matthew Swank
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <pan.2007.05.22.23.34.37.466761@c.net>
On Tue, 22 May 2007 05:52:37 +0000, Damien Kick wrote:

> I'd be willing to contribute money to an effort to implement a 
> newsreader with a Harrop-index kill-file filter.  It would have to use 
> the concept of a Harrop-index to sort signal from noise.

Has anyone tried running his posts through a RID analysis:
http://lemonodor.com/archives/001511.html?

Matt

-- 
"You do not really understand something unless you
 can explain it to your grandmother." - Albert Einstein.
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <Z_L4i.6818$XU7.3821@newsfe12.lga>
Matthew Swank wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 05:52:37 +0000, Damien Kick wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'd be willing to contribute money to an effort to implement a 
>>newsreader with a Harrop-index kill-file filter.  It would have to use 
>>the concept of a Harrop-index to sort signal from noise.
> 
> 
> Has anyone tried running his posts through a RID analysis:
> http://lemonodor.com/archives/001511.html?

Sign those bad boys up!

kenny
From: Joe Marshall
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179859239.828787.163550@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On May 20, 5:43 pm, Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> Other ideas for the Harrop Index welcome. k

Not worth the effort.  He's got a limited shelf life and will soon be
bored and move on.

ilias - 3 months
The Peaceman - 2 months
gavino - 7 months

Hmmm.  I can't remember the names of the other random trolls we've
had.  I guess your fifteen minutes is pretty fleeting on this group.
From: Jon Harrop
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <4653421d$0$8746$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Joe Marshall wrote:
> Not worth the effort.  He's got a limited shelf life and will soon be
> bored and move on.

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/msg/c72f55e7b4bf2390?hl=en&

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The F#.NET Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?usenet
From: Matthew Swank
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <pan.2007.05.22.19.47.41.807240@c.net>
On Sun, 20 May 2007 20:43:30 -0400, Ken Tilton wrote:

> 
> 
> Tim Bradshaw wrote:
>> Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
>> realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
>> but eventually it eats your life.  I find myself hitting refresh to see 
>> what idiocy he's come up with this time.  May be I'll check back in 
>> another couple of years.
>> 
> 
> Well I fer one am LMAO as you try to get the monkey off your back.
> 
...
> Counting a behavior changes it. I am not smart like you 
> guys. Can someone write the code to print daily/cumulative totals? 

...
> 
> Other ideas for the Harrop Index welcome. k

So is this a Meta-Troll?

Matt
-- 
"You do not really understand something unless you
 can explain it to your grandmother." - Albert Einstein.
From: Ken Tilton
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <qkI4i.36$Lk4.17@newsfe12.lga>
Matthew Swank wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007 20:43:30 -0400, Ken Tilton wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>>Tim Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>>Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
>>>realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
>>>but eventually it eats your life.  I find myself hitting refresh to see 
>>>what idiocy he's come up with this time.  May be I'll check back in 
>>>another couple of years.
>>>
>>
>>Well I fer one am LMAO as you try to get the monkey off your back.
>>
> 
> ...
> 
>>Counting a behavior changes it. I am not smart like you 
>>guys. Can someone write the code to print daily/cumulative totals? 
> 
> 
> ...
> 
>>Other ideas for the Harrop Index welcome. k
> 
> 
> So is this a Meta-Troll?

Precisely. The topic becomes Jon Harrop's behavior, and these threads 
will be vastly more entertaining than his mistakes about Lisp and the 
earnest but tedious corrections the nice people have offered.

Now it is Kenny's turn. Not Ken, not Kenneth, neither Kenzo, Kzo, nor 
Kxo. Kenny. Kenny and the Hounds. Kenny and the Hounds and the Savages. 
We'll be opening for American Idol on tour. I digress.

The trick to eradicating harrosites, should the sugar trail over to 
c.l.python not work, is not not to respond to him. That is like trying 
not to think. Meditators use a mantra on which to concentrate, because 
focusing on something is easier than not focusing at all, and as long as 
I am focused on something void such as a mantra I am close enough to not 
concentrating to begin the transition to a meditative state where 
thought truly ceases.

The key is simply to push out the annoying harrop thread with an 
entertaining harrop thread that has nothing to do with anything but him 
being rude.

The best part is, knowing this will not save him. :)

kenny
From: Bob Felts
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <1hyix55.4k7dj6vt2qgwN%wrf3@stablecross.com>
Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:

> Meditators use a mantra on which to concentrate, because 
> focusing on something is easier than not focusing at all, and as long as
> I am focused on something void such as a mantra I am close enough to not
> concentrating to begin the transition to a meditative state where 
> thought truly ceases.

Eight, sir; seven, sir;
Six, sir; five, sir;
Four, sir; three, sir;
Two, sir; one!
Tenser, said the Tensor.
Tenser, said the Tensor.
Tension, apprehension,
And dissension have begun.
From: Raymond Wiker
Subject: Re: The Harrop Index [was Re: Jon Harrop]
Date: 
Message-ID: <m2fy5ok1d6.fsf@RawMBP.local>
····@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:

> Ken Tilton <···········@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>> Meditators use a mantra on which to concentrate, because 
>> focusing on something is easier than not focusing at all, and as long as
>> I am focused on something void such as a mantra I am close enough to not
>> concentrating to begin the transition to a meditative state where 
>> thought truly ceases.
>
> Eight, sir; seven, sir;
> Six, sir; five, sir;
> Four, sir; three, sir;
> Two, sir; one!
> Tenser, said the Tensor.
> Tenser, said the Tensor.
> Tension, apprehension,
> And dissension have begun.

	Demolished.
From: Rainer Joswig
Subject: Re: Jon Harrop
Date: 
Message-ID: <joswig-CF0D68.23073820052007@news-europe.giganews.com>
In article <·····················@news.demon.co.uk>,
 Tim Bradshaw <···@tfeb.org> wrote:

> Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
> realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
> but eventually it eats your life.  I find myself hitting refresh to see 
> what idiocy he's come up with this time.  May be I'll check back in 
> another couple of years.

He is a troll and spammer. Since he has no clue, his
postings are not even interesting. He doesn't contribute anything
useful to comp.lang.lisp. Best to ignore and killfile him.
Any discussion with him is just a waste of time...

-- 
http://lispm.dyndns.org
From: Rainer Joswig
Subject: Re: Jon Harrop
Date: 
Message-ID: <joswig-0DB680.16460908062007@news-europe.giganews.com>
In article <·····················@news.demon.co.uk>,
 Tim Bradshaw <···@tfeb.org> wrote:

> Well, I've had enough.  Although I'm enjoying bating him enormously, I 
> realise it's the kind of enjoyment one gets from heroin: fun for sure, 
> but eventually it eats your life.  I find myself hitting refresh to see 
> what idiocy he's come up with this time.  May be I'll check back in 
> another couple of years.


Jon Harrop (aka 'we') advertises in comp.sys.mac.advocacy :

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_frm/thread/a10d3b9daa38ee52/e4f162cf4eb4442f#e4f162cf4eb4442f

;-)


He even did the Google trends trick again.

-- 
http://lispm.dyndns.org
From: Tim Bradshaw
Subject: Re: Jon Harrop
Date: 
Message-ID: <1181387730.586233.186030@n4g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 8, 9:39 pm, Rainer Joswig <······@lisp.de> wrote:

>
> You have a Mac? Got just lately? ;-)

Over a year ago.  But it all makes sense because I'm probably about to
buy another, since I need a laptop.  He's obviously trying to get
involved in some way.  He's really a tragic character.