From: Joe Marshall
Subject: [Troll] Language popularity
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179006823.480792.70960@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Yes, this is more of the same pissing contest, so just kill the thread
if you are bored with it.

Job offerings on Dice
  Lisp:    33
  Haskell:  9
  OCaml:  2

Job offerings on Monster
  Lisp:  9
  Haskell: 1
  OCaml:  2

Job offerings on Career Builder:
  Lisp:  28
  Haskell: 9
  OCaml: 1

Job offerings on Hotjobs
  Lisp: 14
  Haskell: 1
  OCaml: 0

  ``Few people write C any more.'' -- Jon Harrop

From: George Neuner
Subject: Re: [Troll] Language popularity
Date: 
Message-ID: <qq3d431n9js2glgt9lamh6ohiohih1elpc@4ax.com>
On 12 May 2007 14:53:43 -0700, Joe Marshall <··········@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Yes, this is more of the same pissing contest, so just kill the thread
>if you are bored with it.


>Job offerings on Dice
>  Lisp:    33
>  Haskell:  9
>  OCaml:  2
   C/C++: 7815

>Job offerings on Monster
>  Lisp:  9
>  Haskell: 1
>  OCaml:  2
   C/C++: 4714

>Job offerings on Career Builder:
>  Lisp:  28
>  Haskell: 9
>  OCaml: 1
	C/C++: 1017

>Job offerings on Hotjobs
>  Lisp: 14
>  Haskell: 1
>  OCaml: 0
	C/C++: 3604


>  ``Few people write C any more.'' -- Jon Harrop

Must be why there are so many C jobs open 8-)

George
--
for email reply remove "/" from address
From: Jon Harrop
Subject: Re: [Troll] Language popularity
Date: 
Message-ID: <46469678$0$8743$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
George Neuner wrote:
> Must be why there are so many C jobs open 8-)

What proportion of the C/C++ jobs are actually C++ jobs? What proportion of
C compilers can't also compile C++ now?

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The F#.NET Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?usenet
From: Alex Mizrahi
Subject: Re: [Troll] Language popularity
Date: 
Message-ID: <46478526$0$90267$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
(message (Hello 'Joe)
(you :wrote  :on '(12 May 2007 14:53:43 -0700))
(

 JM> Yes, this is more of the same pissing contest, so just kill the thread
 JM> if you are bored with it.

 JM> Job offerings on Dice
 JM>   Lisp:    33
 JM>   Haskell:  9
 JM>   OCaml:  2

this looks cool, but i'm afraid most this jobs are something like "you'll 
write in Python/Perl/C++, Lisp knowledge is a bonus", "port legacy Lisp 
system to Java" or something like that.. or that are real Lisp jobs?

)
(With-best-regards '(Alex Mizrahi) :aka 'killer_storm)
"I am everything you want and I am everything you need") 
From: Joe Marshall
Subject: Re: Language popularity
Date: 
Message-ID: <1179167510.686522.153670@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
On May 13, 2:37 pm, "Alex Mizrahi" <········@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
> (message (Hello 'Joe)
> (you :wrote  :on '(12 May 2007 14:53:43 -0700))
> (
>
>  JM> Yes, this is more of the same pissing contest, so just kill the thread
>  JM> if you are bored with it.
>
>  JM> Job offerings on Dice
>  JM>   Lisp:    33
>  JM>   Haskell:  9
>  JM>   OCaml:  2
>
> this looks cool, but i'm afraid most this jobs are something like "you'll
> write in Python/Perl/C++, Lisp knowledge is a bonus", "port legacy Lisp
> system to Java" or something like that.. or that are real Lisp jobs?

There are a couple of real jobs there.  ITA Software is always on the
lookout for Lisp hackers, and their QPX system is written in Common
Lisp.

The situation is a lot better than it was 10 years ago, though!