From: Duke Normandin
Subject: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 05:18:42 +0000
Message-ID: <SKT%h.10929$Vi6.760@edtnps82>

Is newLISP out-of-bounds for this newsgroup? TIA...
-- 
duke    |   A: Yes.                                                     |
        |   >Q: Are you sure?                                           |
        |   >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.  |
        |   >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?                      |

• Re: Is newLISP discussed here? Rainer Joswig
• Re: Is newLISP discussed here? Stefan Scholl
  • Re: Is newLISP discussed here? Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: Is newLISP discussed here? Duke Normandin
      • Re: Is newLISP discussed here? Jeff
        • Re: Is newLISP discussed here? Duke Normandin

From: Rainer Joswig
Subject: Re: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 05:35:17 +0000
Message-ID: <joswig-C0E1AE.07351708052007@news-europe.giganews.com>

In article <···················@edtnps82>,
 Duke Normandin <·······@telus.net> wrote:

> Is newLISP out-of-bounds for this newsgroup?

Not really.

> TIA...

"newLISP" has its own place for discussion.
It's more likely you'll get answers there.

There has been only little talk about newLISP here.

-- 
http://lispm.dyndns.org

From: Stefan Scholl
Subject: Re: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 07:12:45 +0000
Message-ID: <0T42rso0ItrgNv8%stesch@parsec.no-spoon.de>

Duke Normandin <·······@telus.net> wrote:
> Is newLISP out-of-bounds for this newsgroup? TIA...

They have a fan forum with really "nice" people.


-- 
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/

From: Jens Axel Søgaard
Subject: Re: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 07:39:50 +0000
Message-ID: <46402945$0$828$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>

Stefan Scholl skrev:
> Duke Normandin <·······@telus.net> wrote:
>> Is newLISP out-of-bounds for this newsgroup? TIA...
> 
> They have a fan forum with really "nice" people.

Unless you follow c.l.l it is hard to tell whether
this comment is about c.l.l or the newLisp people...

-- 
Jens Axel S�gaard

From: Duke Normandin
Subject: Re: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:42:30 +0000
Message-ID: <We_%h.30274$KN6.3368@edtnps89>

On 2007-05-08, Jens Axel S�gaard <······@soegaard.net> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl skrev:
>> Duke Normandin <·······@telus.net> wrote:
>>> Is newLISP out-of-bounds for this newsgroup? TIA...
>> 
>> They have a fan forum with really "nice" people.
>
> Unless you follow c.l.l it is hard to tell whether
> this comment is about c.l.l or the newLisp people...
>

I'll take it to mean `both'! ;) Thanks to all for the replies.
-- 
duke    |   A: Yes.                                                     |
        |   >Q: Are you sure?                                           |
        |   >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.  |
        |   >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?                      |

From: Jeff
Subject: Re: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 14:24:42 +0000
Message-ID: <1178634282.547860.50360@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Occasionally someone asks a question about newLisp here.  Even more
rarely, it doesn't start a 500-message long argument over its name :)

The newLisp website's forum is good.  The author of the language pipes
in regularly.  So do I.  I am a "nice" person ;).  If you have a
question about it, feel free.

Jeff

On May 8, 8:42 am, Duke Normandin <·······@telus.net> wrote:
> On 2007-05-08, Jens Axel Søgaard <······@soegaard.net> wrote:
>
> > Stefan Scholl skrev:
> >> Duke Normandin <·······@telus.net> wrote:
> >>> Is newLISP out-of-bounds for this newsgroup? TIA...
>
> >> They have a fan forum with really "nice" people.
>
> > Unless you follow c.l.l it is hard to tell whether
> > this comment is about c.l.l or the newLisp people...
>
> I'll take it to mean `both'! ;) Thanks to all for the replies.
> --
> duke    |   A: Yes.                                                     |
>         |   >Q: Are you sure?                                           |
>         |   >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.  |
>         |   >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?                      |

From: Duke Normandin
Subject: Re: Is newLISP discussed here?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 17:41:25 +0000
Message-ID: <9D20i.15828$Vi6.1564@edtnps82>

On 2007-05-08, Jeff <········@gmail.com> wrote:
> Occasionally someone asks a question about newLisp here.  Even more
> rarely, it doesn't start a 500-message long argument over its name :)
>
> The newLisp website's forum is good.  The author of the language pipes
> in regularly.  So do I.  I am a "nice" person ;).  If you have a
> question about it, feel free.
>
> Jeff

Thanks! I just joined the newLISP Fan Club. I posted the message here in
c.l.l. because the above forum seemed to be dead when I registered. Seem
that they're having server problems. I'm hoping that newLISP will serve
as a stepping stone to Lisp itself. ;)
-- 
duke    |   A: Yes.                                                     |
        |   >Q: Are you sure?                                           |
        |   >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.  |
        |   >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?                      |