http://www.common-lisp.net/project/fucc/
FUCC is FU Compiler Compiler -- parser generator for Common Lisp. New
version features new syntax for grammar definition and simple LL
parser generator (LR/LALR parsers were implemented in 0.1).
P.S. Is there any other LL parser generator for Common Lisp?
--
Ivan Boldyrev
Violets are red
Roses are blue
It's amazing what DNA splicing can do.
Ivan Boldyrev wrote:
> http://www.common-lisp.net/project/fucc/
>
> FUCC is FU Compiler Compiler -- parser generator for Common Lisp. New
> version features new syntax for grammar definition and simple LL
> parser generator (LR/LALR parsers were implemented in 0.1).
>
> P.S. Is there any other LL parser generator for Common Lisp?
You appear to have the most complete set of parsers; here are a others.
http://cedet.sourceforge.net/semantic.shtml
http://home.arcor.de/james_anderson/setf/code.html
http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/Prag-Parse.html
- Daniel
P.S. Are you trying to beat "fetter" for the "names which drive away
users" award?
D Herring wrote:
> Ivan Boldyrev wrote:
>
>> http://www.common-lisp.net/project/fucc/
>>
>> FUCC is FU Compiler Compiler -- parser generator for Common Lisp. New
>> version features new syntax for grammar definition and simple LL
>> parser generator (LR/LALR parsers were implemented in 0.1).
>>
>> P.S. Is there any other LL parser generator for Common Lisp?
>
>
> You appear to have the most complete set of parsers; here are a others.
>
> http://cedet.sourceforge.net/semantic.shtml
> http://home.arcor.de/james_anderson/setf/code.html
> http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/Prag-Parse.html
>
> - Daniel
>
> P.S. Are you trying to beat "fetter" for the "names which drive away
> users" award?
To do that he would have to bow to popular opinion and change it. To
GoldenStateBridge.
kzo
--
Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and
I'm happy to state I finally won out over it.
-- Elwood P. Dowd
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.
-- Elwood's Mom
D Herring <········@at.tentpost.dot.com> writes:
> Ivan Boldyrev wrote:
[...]
>> P.S. Is there any other LL parser generator for Common Lisp?
>
> You appear to have the most complete set of parsers; here are a others.
>
> http://cedet.sourceforge.net/semantic.shtml
That's Emacs Lisp, not Common Lisp. (AFAIK, anyway. I wouldn't be
shocked to find that there's a Common Lisp generator hidden in there
too.)
[...]