Is it ever possible? I had a look at the SBCL`s source and revealed
that it`s written in extremly non-portable manner. Am I right?
Just can`t take pleasure of free Common Lisp due to some memory or
multithreading troubles...
·················@gmail.com writes:
> Is it ever possible? I had a look at the SBCL`s source and revealed
> that it`s written in extremly non-portable manner. Am I right?
> Just can`t take pleasure of free Common Lisp due to some memory or
> multithreading troubles...
SBCL on Windows does not use Cygwin.
Zach
Sorry. I`m too reprehensible. But my SBCL doesn`t work on
> SBCL on Windows does not use Cygwin.
AFAIK, no, it does. "SBCL can be built on Windows using either MinGW/
MSYS or Cygwin. "In either case the resulting binary is a non-Cygwin
binary (ie. does not depend on cygwin.dll...)"
http://sbcl-internals.cliki.net/Build%20on%20Windows
It requires Cygwin for building.
> There is a Windows version of SBCL.
Yes, but it`s not working due to weird memory problem.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_frm/thread/b7fcbc5518075bb2/b863d903427144ed#b863d903427144ed
(message (Hello ··················@gmail.com)
(you :wrote :on '(3 Mar 2007 08:08:27 -0800))
(
??>> SBCL on Windows does not use Cygwin.
q> AFAIK, no, it does. "SBCL can be built on Windows using either MinGW/
q> MSYS or Cygwin. "In either case the resulting binary is a non-Cygwin
q> binary (ie. does not depend on cygwin.dll...)"
q> http://sbcl-internals.cliki.net/Build%20on%20Windows
q> It requires Cygwin for building.
so what?? mingw is just a set of GNU tools, it's not an 'emulation layer' or
whatever.
you'd like to build it with cmd and microsoft toolchain??
)
(With-best-regards '(Alex Mizrahi) :aka 'killer_storm)
"?? ???? ??????? ?????")
On 2007-03-03, ·················@gmail.com <·················@gmail.com> wrote:
> It requires Cygwin for building.
No, it does not. MSYS is enough.
--
-- Jerry van Dijk
-- Leiden, Holland
--
-- The owl of Minerva spreads its wings with the falling of the dusk.
> No, it does not. MSYS is enough.
Ok, thank you. I`m still thinking that it would be nice to build such
a complex application just as easy as I build OpenSceneGraph or
wxWidgets.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 01:08:17 -0800, quasistellarlight wrote:
> Is it ever possible? I had a look at the SBCL`s source and revealed
> that it`s written in extremly non-portable manner. Am I right?
> Just can`t take pleasure of free Common Lisp due to some memory or
> multithreading troubles...
I think it's the other way around; Win32 has extremely poor support for
portability.
--
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://nostdal.org/
(message (Hello 'Lars)
(you :wrote :on '(03 Mar 2007 10:05:43 GMT))
(
LRN> I think it's the other way around; Win32 has extremely poor support
LRN> for portability.
Windows NT certified as fully POSIX (Portable Operating System
Interface)-compliant.
while Linux and *BSD are known to be 'mostly-compliant', but are not
certified.
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX
)
(With-best-regards '(Alex Mizrahi) :aka 'killer_storm)
"�� ���� ������� �����")
Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> Windows NT certified as fully POSIX (Portable Operating System
> Interface)-compliant.
But did you read the article, which was cited on wikipedia?
http://www.gcn.com/print/14_23/31557-1.html
Sounds like lots of problems, if you want to port a Unix application. And
for most Windows versions, like XP, you'll need the 217 MB "Windows
Services for UNIX" installation (but looks like you can download it for
free).
--
Frank Buss, ··@frank-buss.de
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
·················@gmail.com writes:
> Is it ever possible? I had a look at the SBCL`s source and revealed
> that it`s written in extremly non-portable manner. Am I right?
> Just can`t take pleasure of free Common Lisp due to some memory or
> multithreading troubles...
You got that wrong... SBCL is extremely portable, but Windows
is not a platform for portable code.
On 3 Mar 2007 01:08:17 -0800, ·················@gmail.com tried to confuse
everyone with this message:
>Is it ever possible? I had a look at the SBCL`s source and revealed
>that it`s written in extremly non-portable manner. Am I right?
>Just can`t take pleasure of free Common Lisp due to some memory or
>multithreading troubles...
>
There is a Windows version of SBCL. No multithreading yet, unfortunately.
--
|Don't believe this - you're not worthless ,gr---------.ru
|It's us against millions and we can't take them all... | ue il |
|But we can take them on! | @ma |
| (A Wilhelm Scream - The Rip) |______________|