From: David Young
Subject: Re: SBCL and SWI-Prolog
Date: 
Message-ID: <1184857084.029455.86730@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
On Jul 18, 10:54 am, Richard Szopa <·············@gmail.com> wrote:
 (I need a real, WAM based and Edinburgh compatible Prolog,
> so things like PAIP Prolog or Allegro Prolog aren't really an
> alternative).

Have a look at Lispworks and KnowledgeWorks, if you're in a position
to consider a commercial Lisp. From the KnowledgeWorks docs:

"Common Prolog is a logic programming system within Common Lisp. It
conforms closely to Edinburgh Prolog and at the same time integrates
well with Lisp. The basic syntax of Common Prolog is Lisp-like, but an
Edinburgh syntax translator is included that provides the ability to
use pre-existing code. The implementation of Common Prolog was
motivated by the desire to use the logic programming paradigm without
having to give up the advantages of a Lisp development environment.
Common Prolog is tightly integrated with Lisp and can be easily used
in a mixed fashion with Lisp definitions even within the same source
file. Common Prolog predicates are compiled into Lisp functions which
may then be compiled by a standard Lisp compiler. Substantial effort
has gone into providing a powerful debugging environment for Common
Prolog, so that it can be used when building serious applications. The
implementation of Common Prolog is based loosely on the Warren
Abstract Machine (WAM) modified to take advantage of a Lisp
environment's built in support for control flow and memory allocation.
(For more details of the WAM, see An Abstract Prolog Instruction Set,
by David H D Warren, Technical Note 309, SRI International, October
1983.)"

LispWorks is worth every penny of its asking  price.

-- david