From: ·············@zorbatron.it
Subject: Re: a small SBCL question
Date: 
Message-ID: <1167730063.080944.84510@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
Thanks! That's really what I need: sometimes it not so easy to spot the
right implementation-dependent function...

M

Tim X wrote:
> As pointed out by others, there is good "built-in" documentation in
> SBCL. However, if you prefer "on-line" docs in the more traditional
> sense, you may find the CMUCL documentation useful. Much of what is in
> SBCL comes from CMUCL and the documentation for CMUCL can help, even
> if only to help you identify likely function name candidates which you
> can then use 'describe to get the specific docstring.
> 
> Tim