From: mathrick
Subject: Re: A Question about DEFPACKAGE syntax
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:48:40 +0000
Message-ID: <c71c9298-41eb-47ab-8b58-6032f2eaf56b@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>

On Dec 28, 5:31 am, Andreas Davour <·······@updateLIKE.uu.HELLse>
wrote:
[snip]

I'm forced to use Google groups now, which made me notice your
original post was sent with no-archive. Was it intentional?

Cheers,
Maciej

From: Andreas Davour
Subject: Re: A Question about DEFPACKAGE syntax
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:41:27 +0000
Message-ID: <cs94pe18kl4.fsf@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>

mathrick <········@gmail.com> writes:

> On Dec 28, 5:31 am, Andreas Davour <·······@updateLIKE.uu.HELLse>
> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I'm forced to use Google groups now, which made me notice your
> original post was sent with no-archive. Was it intentional?

It was. I was trying to learn how to make gnus insert a no-archive
header automatically and this thread (while still about something I care
about) would show me if the rest of the postings in the thread kept the
header. Apparantly not, and apparantly I have to manually insert it
(which wasn't what I'd hoped for).

/Andreas

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?