http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
OCaml for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?usenet
On Aug 25, 1:18 am, Jon Harrop <····@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
>
> If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
>
> --
> 'Dr' Jon D Harrop, Frying Frog Consultancy
> OCaml for Frogs http://www.ffconsultancy.com/spam/ocaml_for_frogs/?usenet-spam
Readtime error at '$500bn'.
Error: The value $500000000000 is out of range.
1 (continue) Stop spamming.
2 (abort) Return to comp.lang.functional.
3 Give back your 'Dr'.
Type :b for backtrace, :c <option number> to proceed, or :? for other
options
CL-USER 2 : 1 >
Too bad.
On Aug 25, 12:18 am, Jon Harrop <····@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
>
> If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
Here in the Lisp community, we try to avoid numerical errors of three
orders of magnitude.
In article <························@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Bradshaw <··········@tfeb.org> wrote:
> On Aug 25, 12:18 am, Jon Harrop <····@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
> >
> > If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
>
> Here in the Lisp community, we try to avoid numerical errors of three
> orders of magnitude.
He, it could be worse. It could be british billions. ;-)
--
http://lispm.dyndns.org
Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> On Aug 25, 12:18 am, Jon Harrop <····@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
>>
>> If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
>
> Here in the Lisp community, we try to avoid numerical errors of three
> orders of magnitude.
Must have been the astrophysicist in me. Still, a pretty amazing
accomplishment! =8-)
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
OCaml for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?usenet
Jon Harrop wrote:
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
>
> If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/009687.php
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
Pascal Costanza escribi�:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/18/1358204&from=rss
>>
>> If you count OCaml as a Lisp, of course.
>
> http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/009687.php
>
http://paulgoscicki.com/pictures/crazy_frog_is_dead-wallpaper.jpg