Hey,
Since I need to do some "scripting" I'm thinking I should use CLISP
for this instead of SBCL.
The differences between the socket-implementations seem (quick look)
somewhat negligible - but to save some time when switching back and forth
between these two (and others?), are there any already existing
compatibility layers for sockets that are "defacto" the way `CFFI' is for
FFI?
I've seen `usocket' but it seems to lack server-sockets?
--
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://lars.nostdal.org/
Lars Rune Nøstdal wrote:
> Hey,
> Since I need to do some "scripting" I'm thinking I should use CLISP
> for this instead of SBCL.
>
> The differences between the socket-implementations seem (quick look)
> somewhat negligible - but to save some time when switching back and forth
> between these two (and others?), are there any already existing
> compatibility layers for sockets that are "defacto" the way `CFFI' is for
> FFI?
LispNYC almost had something going for this Google summer of code. One
of our number (Perry) was going to team up with someone from here on
c.l.l to carve out a spec, and then we were thinking of taking our
unspent mentoring fees and financing the coding by some worthy yob.
Funny you should bring this up, i was just thinking about pinging the
parties to see if they were game for a winter project.
kt
--
Cells: http://common-lisp.net/project/cells/
"I'll say I'm losing my grip, and it feels terrific."
-- Smiling husband to scowling wife, New Yorker cartoon