From: David Steuber
Subject: cl-cil: Chess In Lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <87k693orge.fsf@david-steuber.com>
Has anyone used this package?  How is it?


-- 
http://www.david-steuber.com/
1998 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport
2006 Honda 599 Hornet (CB600F) x 2 Crash & Slider
It's OK.  You only broke your leg in three places.  Walk it off.

From: John Thingstad
Subject: Re: cl-cil: Chess In Lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <op.s8zjqkt8pqzri1@pandora.upc.no>
On Wed, 03 May 2006 02:57:37 +0200, David Steuber  
<·····@david-steuber.com> wrote:

> Has anyone used this package?  How is it?
>
>

Pretty bad. The lisp leaves something to be desired.
The optimations are highly questionable.

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
From: David Steuber
Subject: Re: cl-cil: Chess In Lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <1146678978.960127.35580@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
John Thingstad wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2006 02:57:37 +0200, David Steuber
> <·····@david-steuber.com> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone used this package?  How is it?
> >
> >
>
> Pretty bad. The lisp leaves something to be desired.
> The optimations are highly questionable.

Nuts.  I guess I'll have to reverse engineer some C code I have.  I was
hoping not to do that because the best way I know to reverse engineer C
is to figure out what the high level meaning of the code is, then
recreate that in Lisp.  I don't want to do C in Lisp.

A possible alternative is to control the C program from Lisp but I
don't really like that idea.  Using FFI would be a bit better.  I
prefer a properly integrated solution though.  I'm as xenophobic as
Lisp is ;-)

Thanks.