When trying-out sbcl-0.9.10 (linux-x86 binary) it barfed at sb-ext::thread.
After some looking through the docs I saw it had to do with NPTL stuff
in the 2.6-kernel related to threading internals.
But alas (chicken/egg) can't use 2.6 cause it does not grok my
advansys-scsi hardware yet, so 2.4.31 has to do for now.
Thus I compiled sbcl-0.9.10 from source whithout sb-ext::threads as
the config macro mentioned in the configuration docs. So far so good
it, it compiled [with clisp-2.38], tests ran ok and it loads in
slime/lispbox.
But something keeps nagging me a bit, hence my question:
Since I am sbcl-internals ignorant, are there any nasty consequences
whith this approach irt the GC and/or threaded applications etc.
Finding out 'the hard way' seems not to be the best approach to me and
re-inventing wheels is not my favorite passtime either.
Cor
--
I do not use any Windows(TM) products, therefore
I do not fear mail from strangers http://www.clsnet.nl/mail.php
If everything else failed to statisfy you,try reading the frig'n manual
(defvar My-Computer '((OS . "GNU/Emacs") (IPL . "GNU/Linux")))
Some entity AKA "daBittweiler" <············@gmail.com>
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> If you only understood :P
> (setq lisp (+ sbcl slime emacs))
just missing the sbcl part, but the acl6//7 and clisp
parts done their job so far, as did emacs.
Cor
--
I do NOT use any Windows(TM) products, therefore
I do NOT fear mail from strangers http://www.clsnet.nl/mail.php
If everything else failed to statisfy you,try reading the frig'n manual
(defvar My-Computer '((OS . "GNU/Emacs") (IPL . "GNU/Linux")))
Cor Gest <···@clsnet.nl> wrote:
> Since I am sbcl-internals ignorant, are there any nasty consequences
> whith this approach irt the GC and/or threaded applications etc.
Disabling thread support has the obvious consequence of, well,
disabling threading. So you won't be able to run threaded
applications.
--
Juho Snellman
Some entity AKA Juho Snellman <······@iki.fi>
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> Cor Gest <···@clsnet.nl> wrote:
> > Since I am sbcl-internals ignorant, are there any nasty consequences
> > whith this approach irt the GC and/or threaded applications etc.
>
> Disabling thread support has the obvious consequence of, well,
> disabling threading. So you won't be able to run threaded
> applications.
Well, presumable it does , but it does not mean that linux 2.4 does
not understand any threading just not the type 2.6 does. [NPTL] since
the vm memory-model is rather different in 2.4 icm 2.6.
So the gist was, could it be this sbcl groks the `native threads' or
cop out and would installing sbcl-8 be wiser.
cor
--
I do NOT use any Windows(TM) products, therefore
I do NOT fear mail from strangers http://www.clsnet.nl/mail.php
If everything else failed to statisfy you,try reading the frig'n manual
(defvar My-Computer '((OS . "GNU/Emacs") (IPL . "GNU/Linux")))