From: BobF
Subject: Ron G
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:46:38 +0000
Message-ID: <yo42zwuz7iwm$.16hnpxdmdhvoz$.dlg@40tude.net> Good paper on packages. Thanks for writing it and making it available!
BTW, the QM paper is also very good. From: funkyj
Subject: Re: Ron G
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:06:58 +0000
Message-ID: <1150870018.286736.303210@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> BobF wrote:
> Good paper on packages. Thanks for writing it and making it available!
>
> BTW, the QM paper is also very good.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA? From: Ron Garret
Subject: Re: Ron G
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:12:24 +0000
Message-ID: <rNOSPAMon-575893.23122420062006@news.gha.chartermi.net> In article <································@40tude.net>,
BobF <··@thanks.net> wrote:
> Good paper on packages. Thanks for writing it and making it available!
>
> BTW, the QM paper is also very good.
Thanks, but such things are probably more appropriately conveyed via
email.
rg From: ···············@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Ron G
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:37:18 +0000
Message-ID: <1150904238.027384.49880@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> No, enjoy the public compliment. :-)
> Thanks, but such things are probably more appropriately conveyed via
> email.