[Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released

From: Peter Herth
Subject: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:32:58 +0000
Message-ID: <drkffg$fsg$01$1@news.t-online.com>

I am happy to announce that Ltk v. 0.88 just has been released. It
took a long time after the last release, but it is filled with detail
work. Bugs have been fixed, new functions added, a glossy polish
applied.
Are you a Ltk user already? Then upgrade!
Are you not a Ltk user yet? Then get it today, as long as the
supply lasts!

Peter

-- 
Ltk, the easy lisp gui http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/

Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released Marco Gidde
- Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released Peter Herth
  - Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released Paolo Amoroso
    - Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released Peter Herth

From: Marco Gidde
Subject: Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:50:50 +0000
Message-ID: <854q3m2ged.fsf@tristan.br-automation.com>

Hi Peter,

Peter Herth <·······@t-online.de> writes:

> I am happy to announce that Ltk v. 0.88 just has been released. It
> took a long time after the last release, but it is filled with detail
> work. Bugs have been fixed, new functions added, a glossy polish
> applied.
> Are you a Ltk user already? Then upgrade!
> Are you not a Ltk user yet? Then get it today, as long as the
> supply lasts!

thanks for the new release.

One little typo crept in: spinbox-command is defined _within_ the
definition of cbcommand. The result is, that INITIALIZE-INSTANCE for
spinboxes uses :spinbox-command instead of the correct :command
keyword.

Regards,

Marco

From: Peter Herth
Subject: Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:44:32 +0000
Message-ID: <drlja8$m2p$00$1@news.t-online.com>

Marco Gidde wrote:
> thanks for the new release.
> 
> One little typo crept in: spinbox-command is defined _within_ the
> definition of cbcommand. The result is, that INITIALIZE-INSTANCE for
> spinboxes uses :spinbox-command instead of the correct :command
> keyword.

Fixed it, so now the current Ltk version is 0.881 :)

Peter

-- 
Ltk, the easy lisp gui http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/

From: Paolo Amoroso
Subject: Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:51:29 +0000
Message-ID: <8764o1zjry.fsf@plato.moon.paoloamoroso.it>

Peter Herth <·······@t-online.de> writes:

> Fixed it, so now the current Ltk version is 0.881 :)

Are you using TeX/MetaFont-style version numbers? :)


Paolo
-- 
Why Lisp? http://wiki.alu.org/RtL%20Highlight%20Film
The Common Lisp Directory: http://www.cl-user.net

From: Peter Herth
Subject: Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:57:19 +0000
Message-ID: <drlnil$ijk$01$1@news.t-online.com>

Paolo Amoroso wrote:
> Peter Herth <·······@t-online.de> writes:
> 
> 
>>Fixed it, so now the current Ltk version is 0.881 :)
> 
> 
> Are you using TeX/MetaFont-style version numbers? :)
> 

Well, I really thought hard what to do... bumping directly
to 0.89 would have been disappropriate for a fix which just
exchanges the order of an s-expression. On the other side
I didn't want to have ambiguity about the current Ltk version.
So I will bump the smallest digit for small bug-fix releases
and go to 0.89 for the next feature-enhancing release.
But in a sense I try to make 1.0 not the first real, but rather
to be the last release of Ltk ever :).
(Before anyone gets worried, I do not plan to stop developing
Ltk as a package, just make 1.0 the realease that could be
considered as "complete")

Peter

-- 
Ltk, the easy lisp gui http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/