I don't know why it isn't compiling with MinGW, but the Microsoft tools
are free.
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Other-Programming-Files/Microsoft-Visual-C-Toolkit.shtml
I needed the platform sdk and the .net sdk as well.
retupmoca wrote:
> I don't know why it isn't compiling with MinGW, but the Microsoft tools
> are free.
> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Other-Programming-Files/Microsoft-Visual-C-Toolkit.shtml
> I needed the platform sdk and the .net sdk as well.
Maybe I'm overcautious, but I would download it only from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/
--
Frank Buss, ··@frank-buss.de
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
"retupmoca" <·········@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't know why it isn't compiling with MinGW, but the Microsoft tools
> are free.
No. They are gratis. You don't have their sources, so you cannot check
that they don't include a trojan in all generated executable.
You need to read once more: http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html
Of course, of you only compiled gcc (with gcc)* with gcc, you couldn't
be 100% sure that there is no trojan from the first mother cell, but
I'd still trust it a tad more than any closed source software.
> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Other-Programming-Files/Microsoft-Visual-C-Toolkit.shtml
> I needed the platform sdk and the .net sdk as well.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not
want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein