From: ············@gmail.com
Subject: Why no CLAN?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:42:56 +0000
Message-ID: <1132116176.136605.314300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

There's CRAN for R, There's CTAN for TeX, There's CPAN for Perl, why no
CLAN for Lisp?

• Re: Why no CLAN? Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Why no CLAN? John Thingstad

From: Kaz Kylheku
Subject: Re: Why no CLAN?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:48:57 +0000
Message-ID: <1132116537.707760.326790@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

············@gmail.com wrote:
> There's CRAN for R, There's CTAN for TeX, There's CPAN for Perl, why no
> CLAN for Lisp?

Because TeX and Perl are languages, whereas Lisp is just a name for a
fuzzily defined family of languages? But Common Lisp (CL) is a
language, and so there is something called CCLAN. 
 
:)

From: John Thingstad
Subject: Re: Why no CLAN?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:16:11 +0000
Message-ID: <op.s0b909kppqzri1@mjolner.upc.no>

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 05:42:56 +0100, <············@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> There's CRAN for R, There's CTAN for TeX, There's CPAN for Perl, why no
> CLAN for Lisp?
>

Most prefer a pefix CL.. so try CLIKI. (well www.cliki.net)
List programmers when they hear something like
TAN -- Tape Archive Network scatter. Sounds all to much like
a dinosaur..
wiki as in net/cl-wiki is cosher.

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/