From: Rainer Joswig
Subject: Re: CL Insight...
Date: 
Message-ID: <BF8F09AF.1CCAD%joswig@lisp.de>
Am 02.11.2005 23:58 Uhr schrieb "J.C. Roberts" unter
<··············@abac.com> in ··································@4ax.com:

> I hold nothing against commercial lisp vendors trying making a living
> from all their hard work and personally, I don't mind paying for a
> solid implementation but unfortunately, I'm lucky by comparison to
> some of the other developers in this world. I would really like to use
> CL as the primary language for my project but after weeks of reading
> and searching, I'm still looking for a legal and fair way to do it.

For a complex application LispWorks would be a good choice.

If you want to replace Perl with a Common Lisp implementation for
'scripting', I'd go with CLISP ( http://clisp.cons.org/ ).

> 
> Any insight would be appreciated.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> JCR