From: Mamut
Subject: Comparing LISP implementations
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:05:38 +0000
Message-ID: <1130933138.565852.18990@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Hi all,

Is there a chart of sorts that compares different Common Lisp
implementations?

• Re: Comparing LISP implementations Pedro Kröger
  • Re: Comparing LISP implementations Mamut
  • Re: Comparing LISP implementations Edi Weitz

From: Pedro Kröger
Subject: Re: Comparing LISP implementations
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:46:43 +0000
Message-ID: <1130935603.877830.149700@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

There is a partial table here:

http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation

and here:

http://www.cliki.net/features

Pedro Kröger

From: Mamut
Subject: Re: Comparing LISP implementations
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:32:48 +0000
Message-ID: <1130938368.332914.27080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Thank you!

From: Edi Weitz
Subject: Re: Comparing LISP implementations
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:50:53 +0000
Message-ID: <ur79zqhtu.fsf@agharta.de>

On 2 Nov 2005 04:46:43 -0800, "Pedro Kr�ger" <············@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a partial table here:
>
> http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation

Yes, this is partial in the sense that only "free" implementations are
listed.  This page

  <http://wiki.alu.org/Implementation>

lists some other implementations but there's no side-by-side
comparison yet.

Cheers,
Edi.

-- 

Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.

Real email: (replace (subseq ·········@agharta.de" 5) "edi")