From: Christopher Browne
Subject: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <61ife.30367$VL3.1040837@news20.bellglobal.com>
Following is a summary of articles spanning a 7 day period,
beginning at 01 May 2005 06:05:44 GMT and ending at
08 May 2005 04:34:22 GMT.

Notes
=====

    - A line in the body of a post is considered to be original if it
      does *not* match the regular expression /^\s{0,3}(?:>|:|\S+>|\+\+|\|\s+|\*\s)/.
    - All text after the last cut line (/^-- $/) in the body is
      considered to be the author's signature.
    - The scanner prefers the Reply-To: header over the From: header
      in determining the "real" e-mail address and name.
    - Original Content Rating is the ratio of the original content volume
      to the total body volume.
    - Please send all comments to Christopher Browne <········@acm.org>

Totals
======

Posters:  205
Articles: 806 (313 with cutlined signatures)
Threads:  106
Volume generated: 2072.8 kb
    - headers:    975.3 kb (14,448 lines)
    - bodies:     1052.7 kb (27,172 lines)
    - original:   643.3 kb (17,830 lines)
    - signatures: 44.0 kb (1,050 lines)

Original Content Rating: 0.611

Averages
========

Posts per poster: 3.9
    median: 2 posts
    mode:   1 post - 76 posters
    s:      5.9 posts
Posts per thread: 7.6
    median: 3.0 posts
    mode:   1 post - 26 threads
    s:      46.1 posts
Message size: 2633.5 bytes
    - header:     1239.1 bytes (17.9 lines)
    - body:       1337.4 bytes (33.7 lines)
    - original:   817.4 bytes (22.1 lines)
    - signature:  55.9 bytes (1.3 lines)

Top 10 Posters by Number of Posts
=================================

         (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Posts  Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Address
-----  --------------------------  -------

   54   143.6 ( 60.6/ 73.4/ 38.8)  Pascal Bourguignon <···@informatimago.com>
   41   138.9 ( 51.6/ 83.5/ 38.3)  Ulrich Hobelmann <···········@web.de>
   32   109.3 ( 38.4/ 70.9/ 50.8)  Kent M Pitman <······@nhplace.com>
   22    54.6 ( 26.6/ 22.8/  9.3)  Kenny Tilton <·······@nyc.rr.com>
   21    46.3 ( 24.9/ 21.4/ 12.4)  Christopher C. Stacy <······@news.dtpq.com>
   16    29.5 ( 19.4/ 10.1/  5.7)  ·············@gmail.com" <············@gmail.com>
   14    36.2 ( 17.7/ 18.6/  7.5)  ·······@cs.nyu.edu
   14    39.0 ( 19.4/ 19.6/ 16.4)  David Golden <············@oceanfree.net>
   13    21.8 ( 13.9/  5.1/  2.5)  Paolo Amoroso <·······@mclink.it>
   13    30.1 ( 15.9/ 13.7/  7.0)  Gareth McCaughan <················@pobox.com>

These posters accounted for 29.8% of all articles.

Top 10 Posters by Volume
========================

  (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Posts  Address
--------------------------  -----  -------

 143.6 ( 60.6/ 73.4/ 38.8)     54  Pascal Bourguignon <···@informatimago.com>
 138.9 ( 51.6/ 83.5/ 38.3)     41  Ulrich Hobelmann <···········@web.de>
 109.3 ( 38.4/ 70.9/ 50.8)     32  Kent M Pitman <······@nhplace.com>
  81.5 ( 20.2/ 61.3/ 39.1)     13  Robert Marlow <··········@bobturf.org>
  54.6 ( 26.6/ 22.8/  9.3)     22  Kenny Tilton <·······@nyc.rr.com>
  48.4 ( 10.9/ 37.5/ 25.7)      7  Don Geddis <···@geddis.org>
  46.5 ( 18.5/ 28.0/ 15.7)     12  "Tayssir John Gabbour" <···········@yahoo.com>
  46.3 ( 24.9/ 21.4/ 12.4)     21  Christopher C. Stacy <······@news.dtpq.com>
  39.0 ( 19.4/ 19.6/ 16.4)     14  David Golden <············@oceanfree.net>
  36.2 ( 17.7/ 18.6/  7.5)     14  ·······@cs.nyu.edu

These posters accounted for 35.9% of the total volume.

Top 10 Posters by OCR (minimum of five posts)
==============================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Address
-----  --------------  -----  -------

1.000  (  0.5 /  0.5)      6  "CM1" <········@walla.com>
0.974  ( 19.0 / 19.5)     10  Bulent Murtezaoglu <··@acm.org>
0.892  (  6.0 /  6.8)      5  Frank Buss <··@frank-buss.de>
0.837  ( 16.4 / 19.6)     14  David Golden <············@oceanfree.net>
0.767  ( 10.5 / 13.7)     10  "Steven M. Haflich" <···@alum.mit.edu>
0.761  ( 11.4 / 15.0)      6  ····@spamto.devnul.com
0.742  (  7.0 /  9.5)      6  David Trudgett <······@zeta.org.au.nospamplease>
0.734  (  6.4 /  8.7)      8  Wade Humeniuk <··················@telus.net>
0.717  ( 50.8 / 70.9)     32  Kent M Pitman <······@nhplace.com>
0.707  (  4.6 /  6.5)      7  Christophe Rhodes <·····@cam.ac.uk>

Bottom 10 Posters by OCR (minimum of five posts)
=================================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Address
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.458  ( 38.3 / 83.5)     41  Ulrich Hobelmann <···········@web.de>
0.430  (  1.3 /  3.1)      5  "jonathon" <···········@bigfoot.com>
0.414  (  8.1 / 19.6)      7  "Takuon Soho" <···@somwhere.net>
0.407  (  1.6 /  4.0)      8  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Thieme?= <······························@justmail.de>
0.406  (  9.3 / 22.8)     22  Kenny Tilton <·······@nyc.rr.com>
0.404  (  1.1 /  2.6)      5  Christopher Koppler <········@chello.at>
0.401  (  7.5 / 18.6)     14  ·······@cs.nyu.edu
0.387  (  1.6 /  4.2)      5  ···@gnu.org
0.349  (  2.9 /  8.4)      6  Ingvar <······@hexapodia.net>
0.279  (  2.7 /  9.7)      9  =?iso-8859-1?q?Lars_Rune_N=F8stdal?= <···········@gmail.com>

Top 10 Threads by Number of Posts
=================================

Posts  Subject
-----  -------

  143  Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
   51  Wondering if you guys would like to comment on this
   39  hilarious (you can't make up stuff like that)
   32  Lisp Book(s) in the K&R Style
   31  This Lispofobics really gone too far
   21  Lispy without macros and/or CLOS?
   21  How to change people's minds about LISP?
   20  Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
   20  Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
   19  Alternative tof Microsoft Windows vis a vis Lisp

Top 10 Threads by Volume
========================

  (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Posts  Subject
--------------------------  -----  -------

 545.4 (226.6/312.5/200.7)    143  Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
 122.0 ( 55.0/ 63.3/ 36.9)     51  Wondering if you guys would like to comment on this
  75.9 ( 42.9/ 31.6/ 17.4)     39  hilarious (you can't make up stuff like that)
  61.2 ( 34.3/ 24.5/ 17.7)     32  Lisp Book(s) in the K&R Style
  60.4 ( 23.4/ 35.9/ 20.6)     19  ANSI question (load evaluation order)
  60.2 ( 25.3/ 33.8/ 19.8)     20  Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
  59.1 ( 37.8/ 19.0/ 11.4)     31  This Lispofobics really gone too far
  53.8 ( 27.9/ 24.1/ 14.8)     21  How to change people's minds about LISP?
  52.4 ( 19.2/ 32.7/ 12.9)     19  Alternative tof Microsoft Windows vis a vis Lisp
  52.1 ( 20.2/ 30.8/ 17.0)     19  An idea for a freak DWIM lisp-2

Top 10 Threads by OCR (minimum of three posts)
==============================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Subject
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.940  ( 12.2/  13.0)      4  Critique my code: using Lisp to parse lots of "ps -elf" files in AIX
0.869  (  3.1/   3.5)      4  Implementing custom containers  in Lisp
0.775  (  5.8/   7.5)      5  Axiom graphics porting
0.724  (  5.7/   7.9)     10  floating point performance in cmucl, lispworks and acl
0.722  (  7.5/  10.3)     14  anamorphic macros
0.719  ( 17.7/  24.5)     32  Lisp Book(s) in the K&R Style
0.677  (  2.4/   3.5)      6  Exact decimals in Python
0.671  (  2.3/   3.4)      5  question about CMUCL processes
0.669  (  1.0/   1.5)      4  Parser With Lisp
0.661  ( 11.6/  17.6)      9  CLOS block compilation type checking

Bottom 10 Threads by OCR (minimum of three posts)
=================================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Subject
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.473  (  0.5 /  1.0)      3  What was rms's original plan for GNU ?
0.472  (  4.2 /  8.9)     13  How do I create a string with #\Newline  in it?
0.460  ( 10.1 / 22.0)     20  Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
0.454  (  2.7 /  5.9)      9  clisp: = and eql
0.436  (  2.4 /  5.6)      6  cmucl multiprocessing/mp package
0.432  (  1.8 /  4.2)      8  scheme in lisp
0.396  (  3.8 /  9.7)      7  looking for FFI examples with CLISP (newbie)
0.395  ( 12.9 / 32.7)     19  Alternative tof Microsoft Windows vis a vis Lisp
0.358  (  3.8 / 10.7)      7  Assertions
0.339  (  2.5 /  7.4)     12  The Harm of hard-wrapping Lines

Top 10 Targets for Crossposts
=============================

Articles  Newsgroup
--------  ---------

      27  comp.lang.scheme
      19  comp.lang.functional
      16  comp.lang.c
      13  talk.bizarre
      13  misc.misc
      13  alt.society.homeless
       5  talk.rape
       5  macromedia.dreamweaver.appdev
       5  alt.sports.baseball.ny-mets
       5  comp.lang.clipper.visual-objects

Top 10 Crossposters
===================

Articles  Address
--------  -------

      18  "CM1" <········@walla.com>
      10  Sunnan <······@handgranat.org>
       6  Richard Bos <···@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl>
       6  =?iso-8859-1?q?Lars_Rune_N=F8stdal?= <···········@gmail.com>
       6  Joona I Palaste <·······@cc.helsinki.fi>
       6  ····@Nowhere.com
       5  =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <···@inprovide.com>
       5  vermicule <······@bigpond.net.au>
       4  Keith Thompson <·····@mib.org>
       4  "Jamie Macleod" <·····················@yahoo.ca>