Newbie wrote:
> I wonder which one is better. Or any other choice.
>
> Isn't there anyone who explain each pros and cons ?
i use UncommonWeb http://common-lisp.net/project/ucw/
There is also some (sparse) information on CL and web programming here
http://lisp.tech.coop/Web%20Programming
and more on UCW and continuation passing style here:
http://lisp.tech.coop/Web%2FContinuation
--
Drew Crampsie
drewc at tech dot coop
"Never mind the bollocks -- here's the sexp's tools."
-- Karl A. Krueger on comp.lang.lisp
From: Marco Baringer
Subject: Re: Lisp web framework. KPAX and WebActions
Date:
Message-ID: <m2oedi2oha.fsf@soma.local>
"Newbie" <···········@gmail.com> writes:
> I wonder which one is better. Or any other choice.
>
> Isn't there anyone who explain each pros and cons ?
conceptually they're quite similar. one uses LSP for templating
(kpax), one uses CLP (webactions), both provide session management
(though, afair, only webactions does automatic url rewriting if
cookies are not available). kpax includes a lisp prevalence mechanism
(though webactions users can just uses franz's excellent
allegrostore). if you like the kpax and webactions style i'd also
suggest looking at tbnl: http://www.weitz.de/tbnl/. if you're willing
to revitalize some old code i'd suggest walking through IMHO as well
(think apple's webobjects).
of course, what you really want is ucw
(http://common-lisp.net/project/ucw) but i'll let you figure that out
on your own.
--
-Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget the perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen