On 4 Mar 2005 06:16:35 -0800, "F�rster vom Silberwald"
<··········@hotmail.com> wrote:
> BR Mar 4, 2:27 am wrote:
>
>==
>Couldn't the same be said for Forth?
>==
>
>It happend once that I have been exploring Forth on the Mac; it was
>PowerMops Forth which had some substantial additions to pure insane
>standard Forth.
>
>However, I mean comparing Forth to Lisp hurts. Surely, one should have
>a better knowledge of Forth than what I call my knowledge of Forth. But
>have you ever seen numerical algorithms implemented in standard Forth
>(study the Forth scientific library)? I mean what are all the chemical
>substances which have wrecked havoc in all the brains of Forth users?
>Nobody on earth can tell me that a human beeing voluntarily choses
>Forth for writing numerical code.
What about Lisp and numerical code? Possible, but would be some kind
of mental masturbation...
A.L.
A.L. wrote:
> What about Lisp and numerical code? Possible, but would be some kind
> of mental masturbation...
This former-professor shitbrain troll scum never seen Maxima and Axiom.