Hi
I've seen the constraction like
(format t ··@<erred while invoking ~A on ···@:>" a1 a2)
more than once in code. However, I found nothing neither in 22.3.6.2
nor 22.3.6.3 of HyperSpec which could have thrown a light on it. Can a
conforming application rely on it? And what's the description of it's
doings?
Thanks in advance
--
Vladimir Zolotykh
"Vladimir Zolotykh" <······@eurocom.od.ua> writes:
> Hi
>
> I've seen the constraction like
>
> (format t ··@<erred while invoking ~A on ···@:>" a1 a2)
>
> more than once in code. However, I found nothing neither in 22.3.6.2
> nor 22.3.6.3 of HyperSpec which could have thrown a light on it. Can a
> conforming application rely on it? And what's the description of it's
> doings?
Look in Sec. 22.3.5 "FORMAT Pretty Printer Options".
-Peter
--
Peter Seibel * ·····@gigamonkeys.com
Gigamonkeys Consulting * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/
Practical Common Lisp * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:24:34 GMT, Peter Seibel <·····@gigamonkeys.com>
wrote:
> Look in Sec. 22.3.5 "FORMAT Pretty Printer Options".
Thanks, How could I overlook it!
BTW, reading your PCL gave me a noticable change in my understanding
(or may be my attitude to them) of macros. Now I use them much more
frequently than I did before. Previously I gravitaded chiefly to
functions (or GF) and now I share my interest equally between them
(functions and macros). I think of macros now as one of the most
powerful methods of genralization (factorising?) the code and
frequently it is the only possible way.
--
Vladimir Zolotykh