From: ········@accessbee.com
Subject: Lisp keyboard
Date: 
Message-ID: <1109299430.846643.206730@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
When I was in boy scouts, as part of learning Morse code, I was told
that the inventor of the typewriter originally put the letter 'e' under
the left middle finger, just below its present position.  The typist
was often too fast and the print bars would jam.  I heard the same
story when I took a typing class.  This led me to wonder if 't' might
have been moved from the home row for the same reason.  'E is dit and T
is dash, under middle and index the print bars would clash'.
If e and t on the home row made the human 'typewriter' too fast for the
machine, now that the machine can keep up, wouldn't it be a good idea
to put these letters back where they belong?
My letters over the years to various publications and keyboard
companies have often been answered with the observation that the Dvorak
keyboard, the gold standard, hasn't done very well in the market place
and that even small changes have big costs.  Several days ago an
employee Segin suggested I try 'keytweek'.  I hope that you will email,
or even publish, the following for anyone who might be interested.


The transposition of the letters dfjk with etni on a standard keyboard
increases the amount of text typed from the four keys under the middle
and index fingers by five times, from 7.5% to 37%.  While not as
efficient as the Dvorak keyboard, it is much easier to learn.  The
transposed keys remain under the same fingers and feel very natural.
The transposition can be thought out without benefit of a keyboard map.
 For those who might worry that they will not be able to go back to
qwerty, the experience of many Dvorak users is that a typist can be
bikeyboardal.  The letters etni are fairly easy to get used to but you
may find yourself trying to type dfjk from their old locations.

I have found a keyboard remapping program that is free, downloads
quickly and is very easy to use.  I am typing this email on a keyboard
remapped to the 'etni' transposition layout.  The program is called
'Keytweak 2.11' and can be googled up by that name.  It is available
from several sites, includeing PC magazine and recommended by several
keyboard manufacturers, includeing TypeMatrix.  The creator of the
program is Travis Krumsick.

1)  After you have loaded the program hit start.
2)  Click the keytweak icon and a graphic of a keyboard will appear.
3)  Click the 'Full teach mode' at the bottom of the screen.
4)  A box will appear.  Click 'begin teach mode'.
5)  Press the key you want to reassign, then the key you want it
reassigned to.  In this case d and e.
6)  Click 'remap key#1 to key#2'
7)  The box will disappear and the scancodes of the keys will appear in
the 'pending changes' window at the bottom right.
8)  Follow the same procedure (from 3) for the remaining seven remaps.
9)  Click 'apply' and you will be asked if you want to turn off the
computer to apply the changes.
     At the top there is also a clickable 'restore defaults' to give
you back your qwerty layout.
     I was able to remap in under three minutes and restore qwerty in
thirty seconds, not includeing the restart.

If you would like to determine if etni on the home row is comfortable
for you, you might try typing the paragraph below in pretend mode.

Google is going to have a service that grants a location search option,
it gives unique results in the place where you are.  Recently a company
began selling a wrist computer that uses the palm pilot operating
system and entry character set.  It has real potential to receive
emails, cell phone text messages or the google service.  Perhaps 'may I
have the time'  will become 'may I have the time and weather'.  This
will come out as shown below.

Googld ks gokjg fo havd a sdrvkcd fhaf grajfs a locafkoj sdarch opfkoj,
kf gkvds ujkqud rdsulfs kj fhd placd whdrd you ard.  Rdcdjfly a compajy
bdgaj sdllkjg a wrksf compufdr fhaf usds fhd palm pklof opdrafkjg
sysfdm aje sfylus djfry characfdr sdf.  Kf has rdal pofdjfkal fo
rdcdkvd dmakls, cdll phojd fdxf mdssagds or fhd googld sdrvkcd.
Perhaps 'may I havd fhd fkmd' wkll bdcomd 'may K havd fhd fkmd aje
wdafhdr'.  Fhks wkll comd ouf as showj bdlow.

sfdphdj

From: M Jared Finder
Subject: Re: Lisp keyboard
Date: 
Message-ID: <421eaf36$1@x-privat.org>
········@accessbee.com wrote:
> When I was in boy scouts, as part of learning Morse code, I was told
> that the inventor of the typewriter originally put the letter 'e' under
> the left middle finger, just below its present position.  The typist
> was often too fast and the print bars would jam.  I heard the same
> story when I took a typing class.  This led me to wonder if 't' might
> have been moved from the home row for the same reason.  'E is dit and T
> is dash, under middle and index the print bars would clash'.
> If e and t on the home row made the human 'typewriter' too fast for the
> machine, now that the machine can keep up, wouldn't it be a good idea
> to put these letters back where they belong?

I always thought that where A and S are on QWERTY used to have B and C, 
making the second row BCDFGHJKL, the first half of the alphabet, sans 
vowels.  I have heard that the original keyboard layout was alphabetical.

But what does this have to do with Lisp?

   -- MJF
From: ········@accessbee.com
Subject: Re: Lisp keyboard
Date: 
Message-ID: <1109308926.144882.251070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
What were the other letters on the top row?  I have read that the first
try was something in alphabetical order but that some common bigraphs,
like ed, were too near each other, corresponding to print bars that
jamed because of their proximity.  After that there was an atempt to
alternate these between right and left sides or under the same finger.
You use a keyboard to type your posts to this NG, other than that my
post dosn't belong here.
From: M Jared Finder
Subject: Klassic Keyboards (was Re: Lisp keyboard)
Date: 
Message-ID: <421f52ef@x-privat.org>
········@accessbee.com wrote:
> What were the other letters on the top row?  I have read that the first
> try was something in alphabetical order but that some common bigraphs,
> like ed, were too near each other, corresponding to print bars that
> jamed because of their proximity.  After that there was an atempt to
> alternate these between right and left sides or under the same finger.
> You use a keyboard to type your posts to this NG, other than that my
> post dosn't belong here.

After doing some Googleing, it seems that the original keyboard was 
designed with only two rows, with A-M on the top and N-Z on the bottom. 
  I guess both space constraints and jamming caused the monstrosity that 
is QWERTY.  I type on Dvorak; it feels much much better.

    -- MJF
From: Kaz Kylheku
Subject: Re: Lisp keyboard
Date: 
Message-ID: <1109321671.093806.27780@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
········@accessbee.com wrote:
> When I was in boy scouts, as part of learning Morse code, I was told
> that the inventor of the typewriter originally put the letter 'e'
under
> the left middle finger, just below its present position.

That's all great, but you see, in Lisp programming, the greatest source
of impedance is how fast you can form ideas, not how fast you can type.
From: ········@accessbee.com
Subject: Re: Lisp keyboard
Date: 
Message-ID: <1109388201.233448.66010@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Perhaps M Jared would say that the Dvorak offers a better matching of
impedance between mind and machine.