From: Carl Shapiro
Subject: FBOUNDP and (SETF symbol) function names
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:15:07 +0000
Message-ID: <ouy4qsf9pn8.fsf@panix3.panix.com>

According to the CLHS, the first argument of FBOUNDP, referred to as
"name", is a "function name".  The text "function name" is linked to
the glossary entry for function name which states that a function name
is either a "symbol or a list (setf symbol)".

Am I correct in assuming that (FBOUNDP '(SETF GETHASH)) should return
true in conforming implementations? 

From: Carl Shapiro
Subject: Re: FBOUNDP and (SETF symbol) function names
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:34:19 +0000
Message-ID: <ouyzna78a6s.fsf@panix3.panix.com>

Had I scrutinized the "Notes" section of the CLHS entry for FBOUNDP, I
could have answered my own question (setf expanders are obviously not
the same thing as setf functions).

  [1]> (defun test ())
  TEST
  [2]> (defun (setf test) ())
  (SETF TEST)
  [3]> (fboundp '(SETF TEST))
  T
  [4]>