From: Johnny
Subject: problems with Slime (1.0-pre3)
Date: 
Message-ID: <2a56f6a3.0407202238.60a324e6@posting.google.com>
Overall, Slime looks pretty cool, but I'm having problems with it:

The manual promised that compiler notes would be annoted right in the
source (underlined, highlighted code?) - I saw no such thing.

Rarely, slime enters some kind of infinite loop, and emacs stops
responding to anything.

In slime-repl[N], I can't re-enter old input without doing manual
select&paste&enter.

What's really supposed to happen when I eval code in the source
buffer? Commented code goes to slime-repl[N] and result goes to
mini-buffer? Where there many slime developers excited about such
behavior or is this a bug?
From: ·········@random-state.net
Subject: Re: problems with Slime (1.0-pre3)
Date: 
Message-ID: <cdllus$3hfnv$1@midnight.cs.hut.fi>
Johnny <···················@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Overall, Slime looks pretty cool, but I'm having problems with it:

...and the right place to get help on Slime is:

 ···········@common-lisp.net

To subscribe: 

 http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel

Don't be put off by the -devel postfix: it's very much a help list as
well.

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus                   "Not as clumsy or random as a C++ or Java. 
                             An elegant weapon for a more civilized time."