From: John Thingstad
Subject: Re: Newbie Question: Why is (if ...) a special operator?
Date:
Message-ID: <opsdd4v9hypqzri1@mjolner.upc.no>
Ok, you made me bite.
Yes. Smalltalk is freaky.
The fact that it was designed to corrupt children only adds to the crime.
;)
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
"John Thingstad" <··············@chello.no> writes:
> Ok, you made me bite.
> Yes. Smalltalk is freaky.
> The fact that it was designed to corrupt children only adds to the crime.
> ;)
Which makes me think that it should be rather funny and interesting to
implement a (Common) Lisp in Smalltalk (vs doing the same in awk or in
perl...).
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we.
From: John Thingstad
Subject: Re: Newbie Question: Why is (if ...) a special operator?
Date:
Message-ID: <opsdepiggnpqzri1@mjolner.upc.no>
rlol.
Well go ahead then.
On 27 Aug 2004 14:36:38 +0200, Pascal Bourguignon <····@mouse-potato.com>
wrote:
> "John Thingstad" <··············@chello.no> writes:
>
>> Ok, you made me bite.
>> Yes. Smalltalk is freaky.
>> The fact that it was designed to corrupt children only adds to the
>> crime.
>> ;)
>
> Which makes me think that it should be rather funny and interesting to
> implement a (Common) Lisp in Smalltalk (vs doing the same in awk or in
> perl...).
>
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/