From: Christopher Browne
Subject: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <2oqu6bFdj1buU2@uni-berlin.de>
Following is a summary of articles spanning a 7 day period,
beginning at 15 Aug 2004 06:52:54 GMT and ending at
22 Aug 2004 05:11:57 GMT.

Notes
=====

    - A line in the body of a post is considered to be original if it
      does *not* match the regular expression /^\s{0,3}(?:>|:|\S+>|\+\+|\|\s+|\*\s)/.
    - All text after the last cut line (/^-- $/) in the body is
      considered to be the author's signature.
    - The scanner prefers the Reply-To: header over the From: header
      in determining the "real" e-mail address and name.
    - Original Content Rating is the ratio of the original content volume
      to the total body volume.
    - Please send all comments to Christopher Browne <········@acm.org>

Totals
======

Posters:  130
Articles: 428 (207 with cutlined signatures)
Threads:  60
Volume generated: 971.3 kb
    - headers:    407.0 kb (7,459 lines)
    - bodies:     538.1 kb (14,008 lines)
    - original:   327.5 kb (9,114 lines)
    - signatures: 25.8 kb (618 lines)

Original Content Rating: 0.609

Averages
========

Posts per poster: 3.3
    median: 2.0 posts
    mode:   1 post - 53 posters
    s:      4.1 posts
Posts per thread: 7.1
    median: 4.5 posts
    mode:   1 post - 18 threads
    s:      12.6 posts
Message size: 2324.0 bytes
    - header:     973.8 bytes (17.4 lines)
    - body:       1287.4 bytes (32.7 lines)
    - original:   783.6 bytes (21.3 lines)
    - signature:  61.7 bytes (1.4 lines)

Top 10 Posters by Number of Posts
=================================

         (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Posts  Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Address
-----  --------------------------  -------

   22    47.7 ( 18.2/ 24.6/ 10.5)  Pascal Bourguignon <····@mouse-potato.com>
   15    26.9 ( 13.4/ 13.5/  7.9)  Christopher C. Stacy <······@news.dtpq.com>
   13    32.1 ( 15.3/ 15.0/  7.0)  Peter Seibel <·····@javamonkey.com>
   13    30.8 ( 14.8/ 14.9/  8.6)  Pascal Costanza <········@web.de>
   12    66.8 (  9.1/ 57.6/ 51.0)  ·······@Yahoo.Com <··········@YahooGroups.Com>
   11    17.9 (  8.1/  8.3/  4.1)  Joost Kremers <············@yahoo.com>
   10    33.7 ( 15.6/ 17.5/ 13.8)  Marco Parrone <·····@autistici.org>
   10    21.2 ( 11.1/  9.3/  5.4)  David Steuber <·····@david-steuber.com>
   10    19.3 (  9.4/  9.9/  5.0)  Ron Garret <·········@flownet.com>
    9    25.7 ( 10.7/ 14.3/  7.3)  Frank Buss <··@frank-buss.de>

These posters accounted for 29.2% of all articles.

Top 10 Posters by Volume
========================

  (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Posts  Address
--------------------------  -----  -------

  66.8 (  9.1/ 57.6/ 51.0)     12  ·······@Yahoo.Com <··········@YahooGroups.Com>
  47.7 ( 18.2/ 24.6/ 10.5)     22  Pascal Bourguignon <····@mouse-potato.com>
  33.7 ( 15.6/ 17.5/ 13.8)     10  Marco Parrone <·····@autistici.org>
  32.1 ( 15.3/ 15.0/  7.0)     13  Peter Seibel <·····@javamonkey.com>
  30.8 ( 14.8/ 14.9/  8.6)     13  Pascal Costanza <········@web.de>
  26.9 ( 13.4/ 13.5/  7.9)     15  Christopher C. Stacy <······@news.dtpq.com>
  25.7 ( 10.7/ 14.3/  7.3)      9  Frank Buss <··@frank-buss.de>
  21.2 ( 11.1/  9.3/  5.4)     10  David Steuber <·····@david-steuber.com>
  20.4 (  5.4/ 14.9/ 11.5)      8  "Tayssir John Gabbour" <···········@yahoo.com>
  20.0 (  8.8/ 11.2/  1.9)      8  ·······@cs.nyu.edu

These posters accounted for 33.5% of the total volume.

Top 10 Posters by OCR (minimum of five posts)
==============================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Address
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.940  (  3.4 /  3.6)      5  Tim Lavoie <········@spamcop.net>
0.885  ( 51.0 / 57.6)     12  ·······@Yahoo.Com <··········@YahooGroups.Com>
0.810  (  7.9 /  9.8)      8  Stefan Ram <···@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
0.785  ( 13.8 / 17.5)     10  Marco Parrone <·····@autistici.org>
0.772  ( 11.1 / 14.4)      5  Kaz Kylheku <···@ashi.footprints.net>
0.771  ( 11.5 / 14.9)      8  "Tayssir John Gabbour" <···········@yahoo.com>
0.739  (  2.8 /  3.7)      6  neo88 <······@truevine.net>
0.718  (  2.8 /  3.9)      6  Todd Pierce <···········@hotmail.com>
0.693  (  4.9 /  7.1)      6  ···········@tfeb.org" <··········@tfeb.org>
0.654  (  5.8 /  8.9)      7  "Jeff" <···@nospam.insightbb.com>

Bottom 10 Posters by OCR (minimum of five posts)
=================================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Address
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.505  (  5.0 /  9.9)     10  Ron Garret <·········@flownet.com>
0.488  (  4.1 /  8.3)     11  Joost Kremers <············@yahoo.com>
0.465  (  7.0 / 15.0)     13  Peter Seibel <·····@javamonkey.com>
0.462  (  1.7 /  3.7)      5  Bruce Stephens <············@cenderis.demon.co.uk>
0.429  ( 10.5 / 24.6)     22  Pascal Bourguignon <····@mouse-potato.com>
0.423  (  2.4 /  5.7)      7  Barry Margolin <······@alum.mit.edu>
0.412  (  1.2 /  2.8)      5  Joe Marshall <···@ccs.neu.edu>
0.378  (  3.0 /  7.9)      7  Vassil Nikolov <········@poboxes.com>
0.296  (  1.3 /  4.4)      5  "John Thingstad" <··············@chello.no>
0.169  (  1.9 / 11.2)      8  ·······@cs.nyu.edu

Top 10 Threads by Number of Posts
=================================

Posts  Subject
-----  -------

   79  A programming language is...
   27  Lisp compilation
   22  macros
   21  To diff or not to diff
   20  E. W. Dijkstra VS. John McCarthy.  A rebuttal to Paul Graham's web writings.
   16  Small, Fast Prolog in Lisp?
   15  performance challenge
   14  Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?
   12  Why want to do the things Lisp is best at?
   12  Practical Common Lisp takes apart binary files

Top 10 Threads by Volume
========================

  (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Posts  Subject
--------------------------  -----  -------

 163.7 ( 81.3/ 77.8/ 42.4)     79  A programming language is...
  63.0 ( 30.5/ 31.3/ 18.9)     22  macros
  56.7 ( 21.7/ 33.2/ 20.3)     27  Lisp compilation
  48.0 ( 19.2/ 28.4/ 16.9)     21  To diff or not to diff
  43.7 ( 10.8/ 32.1/ 21.9)     11  The Lisp CPU
  42.9 ( 19.8/ 21.4/ 13.4)     20  E. W. Dijkstra VS. John McCarthy.  A rebuttal to Paul Graham's web writings.
  34.8 (  9.4/ 24.9/ 18.5)     12  Why want to do the things Lisp is best at?
  28.9 ( 11.5/ 16.3/  8.3)     14  Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?
  26.4 ( 12.7/ 13.1/  8.5)     15  performance challenge
  25.6 ( 11.4/ 12.9/  6.0)     12  Practical Common Lisp takes apart binary files

Top 10 Threads by OCR (minimum of three posts)
==============================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Subject
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.872  (  3.3/   3.8)      5  Portable Lisp interface to OpenSSL
0.858  (  3.1/   3.6)      5  Lisp readability
0.791  (  0.9/   1.1)      3  A different string descriptor
0.742  ( 18.5/  24.9)     12  Why want to do the things Lisp is best at?
0.726  (  2.6/   3.5)      3  Lisp in hardware
0.694  (  3.8/   5.5)      3  troll vs troll. I saw it was good
0.685  (  6.8/  10.0)      7  embedded systems
0.682  ( 21.9/  32.1)     11  The Lisp CPU
0.652  (  4.8/   7.4)      4  Paul Graham's teaching style is bad
0.650  (  8.5/  13.1)     15  performance challenge

Bottom 10 Threads by OCR (minimum of three posts)
=================================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Subject
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.530  (  2.9 /  5.5)      6  Cheap, Good Lisps For Novices
0.519  (  6.1 / 11.7)     10  What is a programming language? (was: E. W. Dijkstra VS. John McCarthy. A rebuttal to Paul Graham's web writings.)
0.514  (  5.8 / 11.3)      9  Windoze Lisp
0.507  (  8.3 / 16.3)     14  Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?
0.495  (  3.7 /  7.5)      5  Are the lists produced by backquote always non-literal?
0.491  (  1.4 /  2.8)      4  E. W. Dijkstra VS. John McCarthy. A rebuttal to Paul Graham's
 web writings.
0.462  (  6.0 / 12.9)     12  Practical Common Lisp takes apart binary files
0.453  (  5.1 / 11.3)      8  Actual bit patterns used by write-byte and read-byte?
0.347  (  2.5 /  7.1)      6  request for style evaluation-multiplying polynomials
0.325  (  2.7 /  8.2)      6  Windoze Lisp  [was Re: Cheap, Good Lisps For Novices]

Top 10 Targets for Crossposts
=============================

Articles  Newsgroup
--------  ---------

      27  comp.emacs
      26  comp.editors
      14  sci.math
       1  alt.religion.emacs
       1  comp.lang.scheme

Top 10 Crossposters
===================

Articles  Address
--------  -------

       7  ·······@interaccess.com
       7  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Per_R=F8nne?= <····@husumtoften.dk>
       6  Pascal Bourguignon <····@mouse-potato.com>
       6  "Karl A. Krueger" <········@example.edu>
       6  ·······@Yahoo.Com <··········@YahooGroups.Com>
       6  Alan Mackenzie <···@muc.de>
       5  David Kastrup <···@gnu.org>
       4  Bruce Ingalls <········@verizon._NO.SPAM_.net>
       3  "Mike Cox" <············@yahoo.com>
       3  Joseph Hertzlinger <··························@nine.reticulatedcom.com>
From: Don Stockbauer
Subject: Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <4e315347.0408220248.4cca59be@posting.google.com>
this kind of stuff will be stopped.  there's always a meta-level above stupidity.