From: Gisle Sælensminde
Subject: Solaris and multithreading
Date: 
Message-ID: <slrnb6n8bc.31v.gisle@apal.ii.uib.no>
As far as I understand CMUCL on Solaris don't support multithreading,
is this right. Also are there any other lisps that does?

--
Gisle S�lensminde  
Computational biology unit, University of Bergen, Norway
Email: ·····@ii.uib.no 
From: Bulent Murtezaoglu
Subject: Re: Solaris and multithreading
Date: 
Message-ID: <87zno49qe9.fsf@acm.org>
    GS> As far as I understand CMUCL on Solaris don't support
    GS> multithreading, is this right. Also are there any other lisps
    GS> that does?

Scieneer Common Lisp (based AFAIK partly on CMUCL code) does it using native OS 
facilities (so it will utilize SMP).  Lispworks and Allegro also have multi-threading.

cheers,

BM

  
From: Gisle Sælensminde
Subject: Re: Solaris and multithreading
Date: 
Message-ID: <slrnb6oeps.hdq.gisle@apal.ii.uib.no>
In article <··············@acm.org>, Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
> 
>     GS> As far as I understand CMUCL on Solaris don't support
>     GS> multithreading, is this right. Also are there any other lisps
>     GS> that does?
> 
> Scieneer Common Lisp (based AFAIK partly on CMUCL code) does it using native OS 
> facilities (so it will utilize SMP).  Lispworks and Allegro also have multi-threading.
> 

It was something like this I was looking for. How stable is this CL system?

--
Gisle S�lensminde  
Computational biology unit, University of Bergen, Norway
Email: ·····@cbu.uib.no 
From: Johannes Grødem
Subject: Re: Solaris and multithreading
Date: 
Message-ID: <lzfzpvel1l.fsf@unity.copyleft.no>
* Gisle S�lensminde <·····@apal.ii.uib.no>:

> It was something like this I was looking for. How stable is this CL
> system?

They're offering evaluation versions, so you can find out for
yourself.

http://www.scieneer.com/scl/

-- 
Johannes Gr�dem <OpenPGP: 5055654C>
comp.lang.lisp / 2003 / mar