From: Arthur T. Murray
Subject: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been solved
Date:
Message-ID: <3f3fd4dd@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> If it has, why isn't it telling us itself ?
The primitive-but-sufficient solution to AI is still evolving.
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/apl.html -- for Mind.APL coding.
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/acm.html -- step-by-step DIY AI.
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/theory5.html -- Theory of Mind.
Arthur T. Murray <·····@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
> > If it has, why isn't it telling us itself ?
Artificial intelligence rests on the hope that eventually the computer
will do something only humans can do. Software engineering rests on the
hope that eventually the computer will do something, anything, please?
Anno
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:17:56 +0000, Anno Siegel wrote:
> Artificial intelligence rests on the hope that eventually the computer
> will do something only humans can do. Software engineering rests on the
> hope that eventually the computer will do something, anything, please?
I assume you mean other than crash? :-)
--
Lucius Chiaraviglio
Approximate E-mail address: ·········@chapter.net
To get the exact address: ^^^ ^replace this with 'r'
|||
replace this with single digit meaning the same thing
(Spambots of Doom, take that!).
Lucius Chiaraviglio <·········@chapter.net> writes:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:17:56 +0000, Anno Siegel wrote:
> > Artificial intelligence rests on the hope that eventually the computer
> > will do something only humans can do. Software engineering rests on the
> > hope that eventually the computer will do something, anything, please?
>
> I assume you mean other than crash? :-)
Boycott artificial intelligence! Demand natural intelligence!
--
David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/
Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under
the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well
under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI