From: quasi
Subject: [ot] which cpu ?
Date: 
Message-ID: <3d775b37.815242@News.CIS.DFN.DE>
Friends/Gurus,
	Someone mentioned in our local Linux User Group that 99% of
the CPU told till date are are non i386 types.
	I just wanted to know if it is true.  Any pointers to online
stats?

thank a lot,
quasi
sorry as this is not lisp... but this is the only newsgroup I
subscirbe apart from comp.emacs

From: Barry Margolin
Subject: Re: [ot] which cpu ?
Date: 
Message-ID: <0tKd9.3$sW1.302@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net>
In article <···············@News.CIS.DFN.DE>,
quasi <·········@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Friends/Gurus,
>	Someone mentioned in our local Linux User Group that 99% of
>the CPU told till date are are non i386 types.
>	I just wanted to know if it is true.  Any pointers to online
>stats?

This seems unlikely.  I've heard it reported often that about 90% of
desktop systems run Windows, which only runs on x86, and this has been so
for at least a decade.  And it seems pretty likely that desktop systems
outnumber servers by quite a bit.

-- 
Barry Margolin, ······@genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
From: Raymond Wiker
Subject: Re: [ot] which cpu ?
Date: 
Message-ID: <86ptvs5utq.fsf@raw.grenland.fast.no>
Barry Margolin <······@genuity.net> writes:

> In article <···············@News.CIS.DFN.DE>,
> quasi <·········@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Friends/Gurus,
> >	Someone mentioned in our local Linux User Group that 99% of
> >the CPU told till date are are non i386 types.
> >	I just wanted to know if it is true.  Any pointers to online
> >stats?
> 
> This seems unlikely.  I've heard it reported often that about 90% of
> desktop systems run Windows, which only runs on x86, and this has been so
> for at least a decade.  And it seems pretty likely that desktop systems
> outnumber servers by quite a bit.

        Don't forget the vast amounts of 4-bit processors, PICs etc
used in washing-machines, door-bells and so on. Also, up until very
recently, the Z80 (or derivatives) was a popular choice for mobile
telephones.

        99% sounds a bit high, though.

-- 
Raymond Wiker                        Mail:  ·············@fast.no
Senior Software Engineer             Web:   http://www.fast.no/
Fast Search & Transfer ASA           Phone: +47 23 01 11 60
P.O. Box 1677 Vika                   Fax:   +47 35 54 87 99
NO-0120 Oslo, NORWAY                 Mob:   +47 48 01 11 60

Try FAST Search: http://alltheweb.com/
From: Thomas Stegen CES2000
Subject: Re: [ot] which cpu ?
Date: 
Message-ID: <3d77777b$1@nntphost.cis.strath.ac.uk>
"Barry Margolin" <······@genuity.net> wrote in message
····················@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net...
> In article <···············@News.CIS.DFN.DE>,
> quasi <·········@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Friends/Gurus,
> > Someone mentioned in our local Linux User Group that 99% of
> >the CPU told till date are are non i386 types.
> > I just wanted to know if it is true.  Any pointers to online
> >stats?
>
> This seems unlikely.  I've heard it reported often that about 90% of
> desktop systems run Windows, which only runs on x86, and this has been so
> for at least a decade.  And it seems pretty likely that desktop systems
> outnumber servers by quite a bit.


You must also consider embedded systems and such. Most microwaves, car,
refridgerators, radios, tvs etc probably does not use pentiums. :)

--
Thomas.

Approaching singularity.
From: Hartmann Schaffer
Subject: Re: [ot] which cpu ?
Date: 
Message-ID: <3d77f7c2@news.sentex.net>
In article <···············@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net>,
	Barry Margolin <······@genuity.net> writes:
> In article <···············@News.CIS.DFN.DE>,
> quasi <·········@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Friends/Gurus,
>>	Someone mentioned in our local Linux User Group that 99% of
>>the CPU told till date are are non i386 types.
>>	I just wanted to know if it is true.  Any pointers to online
>>stats?
> 
> This seems unlikely.  I've heard it reported often that about 90% of
> desktop systems run Windows, which only runs on x86, and this has been so
> for at least a decade.  And it seems pretty likely that desktop systems
> outnumber servers by quite a bit.

i suspect this number includes embedded systems (automotive, mobile
phones, etc).  very few of tem use x86 type cpus.  i read somewhere
that they outsell desktps and servers by far

hs

-- 

don't use malice as an explanation when stupidity suffices
From: Felix von Delius
Subject: Re: [ot] which cpu ?
Date: 
Message-ID: <amamju$524$02$1@news.t-online.com>
Surely not (Did You really mean "99% are *non* i386 types"? ;-)

If You take into consideration that Apple Macs have a marketshare estimated 
between 3% and 10% (depends on the sources), and they have PowerPC CPUs, 
that would mean that i386 could at best reach 97%, not counted SPARCs, 
Alphas, MIPS, etc....

quasi wrote:
> Friends/Gurus,
> Someone mentioned in our local Linux User Group that 99% of
> the CPU told till date are are non i386 types.
> I just wanted to know if it is true.  Any pointers to online
> stats?