From: Dorai Sitaram
Subject: CMUCL's equivalent of CLISP's SHELL?
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:10:23 +0000
Message-ID: <arjlkf$bk0$1@news.gte.com>

Is there a procedure or workaround in CMUCL
that corresponds to CLISP's SHELL procedure?

Thanks.

From: Sam Steingold
Subject: Re: CMUCL's equivalent of CLISP's SHELL?
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:38:23 +0000
Message-ID: <m3n0o23342.fsf@loiso.podval.org>

> * In message <············@news.gte.com>
> * On the subject of "CMUCL's equivalent of CLISP's SHELL?"
> * Sent on 21 Nov 2002 22:10:23 GMT
> * Honorable ····@goldshoe.gte.com (Dorai Sitaram) writes:
>
> Is there a procedure or workaround in CMUCL
> that corresponds to CLISP's SHELL procedure?

EXT:RUN-PROGRAM

(if you are writing portable code, you might want to explore CLOCC/PORT,
specifically CLOCC/PORT/shell.lisp; see
<http://www.podval.org/~sds/data/port.html> and
<http://clocc.sf.net>)

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat8 GNU/Linux
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward.