From: Christopher Browne
Subject: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <aq3gu8$6a6gu$1@ID-125932.news.dfncis.de>
Following is a summary of articles spanning a 7 day period,
beginning at 27 Oct 2002 12:02:44 GMT and ending at
03 Nov 2002 03:47:34 GMT.

Notes
=====

    - A line in the body of a post is considered to be original if it
      does *not* match the regular expression /^\s{0,3}(?:>|:|\S+>|\+\+|\|\s+|\*\s)/.
    - All text after the last cut line (/^-- $/) in the body is
      considered to be the author's signature.
    - The scanner prefers the Reply-To: header over the From: header
      in determining the "real" e-mail address and name.
    - Original Content Rating is the ratio of the original content volume
      to the total body volume.
    - Please send all comments to Christopher Browne <········@acm.org>

Excluded Posters
================

····················@mox\.perl\.com

Totals
======

Posters:  148
Articles: 751 (327 with cutlined signatures)
Threads:  64
Volume generated: 1838.9 kb
    - headers:    870.9 kb (12,584 lines)
    - bodies:     923.1 kb (23,213 lines)
    - original:   544.1 kb (14,580 lines)
    - signatures: 44.2 kb (1,182 lines)

Original Content Rating: 0.589

Averages
========

Posts per poster: 5.1
    median: 2.0 posts
    mode:   1 post - 53 posters
    s:      10.2 posts
Posts per thread: 11.7
    median: 3.5 posts
    mode:   1 post - 22 threads
    s:      46.3 posts
Message size: 2507.4 bytes
    - header:     1187.5 bytes (16.8 lines)
    - body:       1258.6 bytes (30.9 lines)
    - original:   741.9 bytes (19.4 lines)
    - signature:  60.3 bytes (1.6 lines)

Top 10 Posters by Number of Posts
=================================

         (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Posts  Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Address
-----  --------------------------  -------

   76   240.1 ( 98.5/129.6/109.0)  Erik Naggum <····@naggum.no>
   57   185.7 ( 76.9/105.2/ 35.5)  arien <·············@getlost.invalid>
   43   119.6 ( 50.5/ 69.0/ 27.3)  Marc Spitzer <········@optonline.net>
   32    66.7 ( 39.3/ 27.4/ 21.2)  Tim Bradshaw <···@cley.com>
   29    66.6 ( 50.5/ 16.1/  9.7)  Len Charest <········@my.inbox>
   26    78.9 ( 36.0/ 42.8/ 20.4)  Brian Palmer <·····@invalid.dom>
   20    39.5 ( 16.3/ 21.6/ 10.1)  Nils Goesche <···@cartan.de>
   17    31.0 ( 22.5/  8.4/  3.1)  Joe Marshall <···@ccs.neu.edu>
   17    31.7 ( 23.0/  8.8/  5.9)  Will Deakin <···········@hotmail.com>
   15    25.4 ( 15.0/  9.5/  9.5)  Vassil Nikolov <········@poboxes.com>

These posters accounted for 44.2% of all articles.

Top 10 Posters by Volume
========================

  (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Posts  Address
--------------------------  -----  -------

 240.1 ( 98.5/129.6/109.0)     76  Erik Naggum <····@naggum.no>
 185.7 ( 76.9/105.2/ 35.5)     57  arien <·············@getlost.invalid>
 119.6 ( 50.5/ 69.0/ 27.3)     43  Marc Spitzer <········@optonline.net>
  78.9 ( 36.0/ 42.8/ 20.4)     26  Brian Palmer <·····@invalid.dom>
  66.7 ( 39.3/ 27.4/ 21.2)     32  Tim Bradshaw <···@cley.com>
  66.6 ( 50.5/ 16.1/  9.7)     29  Len Charest <········@my.inbox>
  44.8 ( 19.6/ 22.3/ 12.2)     15  Pascal Costanza <········@web.de>
  39.5 ( 16.3/ 21.6/ 10.1)     20  Nils Goesche <···@cartan.de>
  37.1 ( 14.9/ 22.2/  6.6)     11  "Justin Johnson" <·······@mobiusent.com>
  31.9 ( 13.5/ 18.4/  9.2)     11  Bruce Hoult <·····@hoult.org>

These posters accounted for 49.5% of the total volume.

Top 10 Posters by OCR (minimum of five posts)
==============================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Address
-----  --------------  -----  -------

1.000  (  9.5 /  9.5)     15  Vassil Nikolov <········@poboxes.com>
0.841  (109.0 /129.6)     76  Erik Naggum <····@naggum.no>
0.812  ( 12.0 / 14.8)      5  Christopher Browne <········@acm.org>
0.778  (  7.3 /  9.3)      5  rif <···@mit.edu>
0.778  (  9.6 / 12.4)     10  Kenny Tilton <·······@nyc.rr.com>
0.773  ( 21.2 / 27.4)     32  Tim Bradshaw <···@cley.com>
0.768  (  5.8 /  7.6)      8  Arthur Lemmens <········@xs4all.nl>
0.747  (  2.4 /  3.3)      7  Espen Vestre <·····@*do-not-spam-me*.vestre.net>
0.700  (  2.8 /  4.1)      5  ······@qnci.net (William D Clinger)
0.684  ( 11.7 / 17.2)     12  ······@lycos.com (Vijay L)

Bottom 10 Posters by OCR (minimum of five posts)
=================================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Address
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.481  (  2.2 /  4.6)      5  ···@gnu.org
0.476  ( 20.4 / 42.8)     26  Brian Palmer <·····@invalid.dom>
0.469  ( 10.1 / 21.6)     20  Nils Goesche <···@cartan.de>
0.433  (  4.6 / 10.6)      8  Nils Goesche <······@cartan.de>
0.424  (  7.3 / 17.2)      9  Piers Cawley <········@bofh.org.uk>
0.396  ( 27.3 / 69.0)     43  Marc Spitzer <········@optonline.net>
0.362  (  3.1 /  8.4)     17  Joe Marshall <···@ccs.neu.edu>
0.343  (  2.8 /  8.1)      5  Sander Vesik <······@haldjas.folklore.ee>
0.337  ( 35.5 /105.2)     57  arien <·············@getlost.invalid>
0.295  (  6.6 / 22.2)     11  "Justin Johnson" <·······@mobiusent.com>

Top 10 Threads by Number of Posts
=================================

Posts  Subject
-----  -------

  368  Re: Difference between LISP and C++
   39  Re: nil (was Re: A strange question...)
   27  some stuff about the 2002 International Lisp Conference in SF
   19  XML parser
   16  Re: Generating graphs in Lisp to include in (La)TeX
   15  (values (multiple-value-form)) whats the point?
   15  PLOB!
   14  Re: Best combination of {hardware / lisp implementation / operating system}
   13  A function-generating function question.
   13  Re: "Well, I want to switch over to replace EMACS LISP with Guile."

Top 10 Threads by Volume
========================

  (kb)   (kb)  (kb)  (kb)
Volume (  hdr/ body/ orig)  Posts  Subject
--------------------------  -----  -------

1063.4 (521.1/519.5/278.7)    368  Re: Difference between LISP and C++
  82.9 ( 41.4/ 40.3/ 20.5)     39  Re: nil (was Re: A strange question...)
  69.0 ( 23.7/ 43.5/ 34.1)     27  some stuff about the 2002 International Lisp Conference in SF
  36.9 ( 10.3/ 25.8/ 16.4)     13  A function-generating function question.
  34.7 ( 14.0/ 18.9/ 12.6)     14  Re: Best combination of {hardware / lisp implementation / operating system}
  34.5 ( 16.7/ 16.0/  8.7)     19  XML parser
  28.6 ( 10.3/ 18.0/ 10.8)     13  c.l.l vs Mel
  28.5 (  8.1/ 19.3/ 15.3)     11  Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
  27.4 ( 12.5/ 14.5/ 10.3)     15  PLOB!
  26.8 ( 14.0/ 12.6/  8.2)     15  (values (multiple-value-form)) whats the point?

Top 10 Threads by OCR (minimum of three posts)
==============================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Subject
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.947  (  7.2/   7.6)      3  Genera 8.3 Y2K Patch
0.848  (  2.3/   2.7)      4  Generating Indented HTML
0.846  (  4.7/   5.5)      8  (make-hash-table :test #'mytest)
0.804  ( 10.0/  12.5)     10  mapping an array to an alphabet
0.796  ( 15.3/  19.3)     11  Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
0.787  (  8.2/  10.4)      7  Re: Lisp advocacy misadventures
0.784  ( 34.1/  43.5)     27  some stuff about the 2002 International Lisp Conference in SF
0.727  (  2.0/   2.8)      3  asking about the effects of DELETE on vectors
0.715  (  3.3/   4.6)      7  Re: Lisp compiler
0.711  ( 10.3/  14.5)     15  PLOB!

Bottom 10 Threads by OCR (minimum of three posts)
=================================================

         (kb)    (kb)
OCR      orig /  body  Posts  Subject
-----  --------------  -----  -------

0.579  (  7.5 / 12.9)     11  Extract function from strings
0.579  (  5.2 /  9.0)     16  Re: Generating graphs in Lisp to include in (La)TeX
0.578  (  2.1 /  3.6)      4  c.l.l. archives
0.558  (  5.2 /  9.3)     13  Re: "Well, I want to switch over to replace EMACS LISP with Guile."
0.543  (  8.7 / 16.0)     19  XML parser
0.536  (278.7 /519.5)    368  Re: Difference between LISP and C++
0.533  (  5.4 / 10.1)      9  Metaclasses reference sought
0.521  (  2.5 /  4.9)      7  Re: iteration vs recursion Performance viewpoint
0.508  ( 20.5 / 40.3)     39  Re: nil (was Re: A strange question...)
0.364  (  2.7 /  7.4)      9  How to access a text file in a given line??

Top 10 Targets for Crossposts
=============================

Articles  Newsgroup
--------  ---------

      32  comp.lang.scheme
      16  comp.lang.smalltalk
      14  comp.text.tex
      14  comp.lang.smalltalk.advocacy
       1  cu.slug
       1  comp.lang.c

Top 10 Crossposters
===================

Articles  Address
--------  -------

      13  Sander Vesik <······@haldjas.folklore.ee>
      12  ···@ashi.footprints.net (Kaz Kylheku)
       5  Tim Bradshaw <···@cley.com>
       5  "Adam Warner" <······@consulting.net.nz>
       5  Brian Elmegaard <·····@rk-speed-rugby.dk>
       4  ······@qnci.net (William D Clinger)
       4  ·········@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
       3  Erik Naggum <····@naggum.no>
       3  ····@gte.com
       3  ··········@hotmail.com (Vlad S.)

From: Carl Shapiro
Subject: Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <ouybs56ty9n.fsf@panix3.panix.com>
Christopher Browne <········@acm.org> writes:

> Excluded Posters
> ================
> 
> ····················@mox\.perl\.com

Do we really have to be reminded of Perl every time these statistics
are posted?
From: Hannah Schroeter
Subject: Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <aq3jn6$irc$1@c3po.schlund.de>
Hello!

Carl Shapiro  <·············@panix.com> wrote:
>Christopher Browne <········@acm.org> writes:

>> Excluded Posters
>> ================

>> ····················@mox\.perl\.com

>Do we really have to be reminded of Perl every time these statistics
>are posted?

Two words: Kill file *g* [1]

Kind regards,

Hannah.

[1] No, I'm not a strong user of kill files, I'm more used to using
mental filters *g*
From: Christopher Browne
Subject: Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <aq3kn2$66ap2$1@ID-125932.news.dfncis.de>
After takin a swig o' grog, Carl Shapiro <·············@panix.com> belched out...:
> Christopher Browne <········@acm.org> writes:
>
>> Excluded Posters
>> ================
>> 
>> ····················@mox\.perl\.com
>
> Do we really have to be reminded of Perl every time these statistics
> are posted?

Not any more, no...  Thanks for pointing that out...
-- 
(reverse (concatenate 'string ········@" "enworbbc"))
http://cbbrowne.com/info/sgml.html
Y2K conversion simplified: Januark, Februark, March, April, Mak, June,
Julk, August, September, October, November, December.
From: Nils Goesche
Subject: Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp
Date: 
Message-ID: <87heeyk570.fsf@darkstar.cartan>
Christopher Browne <········@acm.org> writes:

> 0.469  ( 10.1 / 21.6)     20  Nils Goesche <···@cartan.de>
> 0.433  (  4.6 / 10.6)      8  Nils Goesche <······@cartan.de>

Hey, who's that other guy??



;)

Regards,
-- 
Nils G�sche
Ask not for whom the <CONTROL-G> tolls.

PGP key ID #xD26EF2A0