Thomas K�ufl <······@ira.uka.de> writes:
+----------------------------------------------------------------
| Digitool offers the beta version of MCL for OS X. Has anybody
| worked with this Lisp version already?
+----------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas,
A lot of people have. The best source of information and
discussion that I have found is the "Info-MCL Mailing List."
You can find subscription information here:
http://www.digitool.com/contact.html
Best regards,
Bob
--
Bob Burnham
········@dartmouth.edu
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~bburnham
Bob Burnham <················@dartmouth.edu> writes:
> The best source of information and discussion that
> I have found is the "Info-MCL Mailing List."
> http://www.digitool.com/contact.html
Thank you -- and the others who replied -- for the
answer. I did not know the mailing list.
But when asking a question like this one, Usenet
seems to offer the best forum. (At least as starting
point.)
Regards,
Thomas Kaeufl
From: Pascal Costanza
Subject: Re: Macintosh Common Lisp for OS X
Date:
Message-ID: <3DF0A7C4.6060408@web.de>
Thomas K�ufl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Digitool offers the beta version of MCL for OS X. Has
> anybody worked with this Lisp version already?
>
> Thomas Kaeufl
Yes, and I can recommend it.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza University of Bonn
···············@web.de Institute of Computer Science III
http://www.pascalcostanza.de R�merstr. 164, D-53117 Bonn (Germany)
From: Friedrich Dominicus
Subject: Re: Macintosh Common Lisp for OS X
Date:
Message-ID: <87lm33858j.fsf@fbigm.here>
Pascal Costanza <········@web.de> writes:
> Thomas K�ufl wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Digitool offers the beta version of MCL for OS X. Has
>
> > anybody worked with this Lisp version already?
> > Thomas Kaeufl
>
>
> Yes, and I can recommend it.
Well I used it too, I agree with a slight remark. there are quite
some places where I have thought "It's work in progress, not the final
stuff", things which makes me stumble a bit
Unix conventions for file-names are not implemented?
The message boxes don't look polished (to small margins etc)
the controls supported seem to me just the base line.
The documentation I use is still from 4.3.x I would appriciate an
update
Anyway it seems to be stable...
Regards
Friedrich