On 09 Aug 2002 12:23:13 +0400, Aleksandr Skobelev <···········@list.ru>
wrote:
> Could you compare Stephen Slade's Object-oriented Common Lisp
> vs ANSI Common Lisp? Or just describe OOCL in a little more
> details? The most people in cll recommend ACL, but as I
I found Slade's book boring to death and I never finished reading it. It
has too many--possibly trivial--examples. Not enough meat for me--for some
hopefully meaningful value of "meat". Note that this is just my personal
opinion, and that the book may be valuable to others.
> recently found, OOCL is much more popular on www.amazon.com (with sales
> rank of 173,199 vs 33,166 for ACL).
The book description looked promising to me, that's why I bought it.
Paolo
--
EncyCMUCLopedia * Extensive collection of CMU Common Lisp documentation
http://www.paoloamoroso.it/ency/README