CMUCL on Windows

From: Thaddeus L Olczyk
Subject: CMUCL on Windows
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 07:52:58 +0000
Message-ID: <3c288cd9.1025422796@nntp.interaccess.com>

Are there any plans to port CMUCL to Windows?

Re: CMUCL on Windows Janos Blazi
- Re: CMUCL on Windows Thaddeus L Olczyk
  - Re: CMUCL on Windows Thomas F. Burdick

From: Janos Blazi
Subject: Re: CMUCL on Windows
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 08:03:17 +0000
Message-ID: <3c258f91_2@news.newsgroups.com>

"Thaddeus L Olczyk" <······@interaccess.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
························@nntp.interaccess.com...
> Are there any plans to port CMUCL to Windows?

You can read on the CMUCL home page that "it is being investigated".
J.B.




-----=  Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News  =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
 Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits!
-----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers!  ==-----

From: Thaddeus L Olczyk
Subject: Re: CMUCL on Windows
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 08:38:23 +0000
Message-ID: <3c29979c.1028178234@nntp.interaccess.com>

On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:03:17 +0100, "Janos Blazi" <······@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>"Thaddeus L Olczyk" <······@interaccess.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>························@nntp.interaccess.com...
>> Are there any plans to port CMUCL to Windows?
>
>You can read on the CMUCL home page that "it is being investigated".
>J.B.
>
The only place I saw it mentioned is in answer to a question about a
port to win32. It said that it has been determined that a native port
versus one through cygwin would be better.
Other than that nothing was mentioned.

From: Thomas F. Burdick
Subject: Re: CMUCL on Windows
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 20:04:11 +0000
Message-ID: <xcv666vnk1w.fsf@conquest.OCF.Berkeley.EDU>

······@interaccess.com (Thaddeus L Olczyk) writes:

> On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:03:17 +0100, "Janos Blazi" <······@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >"Thaddeus L Olczyk" <······@interaccess.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> >························@nntp.interaccess.com...
> >> Are there any plans to port CMUCL to Windows?
> >
> >You can read on the CMUCL home page that "it is being investigated".
> >J.B.
> >
> The only place I saw it mentioned is in answer to a question about a
> port to win32. It said that it has been determined that a native port
> versus one through cygwin would be better.
> Other than that nothing was mentioned.

AFAIK, none of the CMUCL developers are interested in personally doing
this, but if someone were, it would be gladly accepted.  It would
probably be a real pain in the butt, but doable.  And it would
definately be easier to port SBCL, then CMUCL.

-- 
           /|_     .-----------------------.                        
         ,'  .\  / | No to Imperialist war |                        
     ,--'    _,'   | Wage class war!       |                        
    /       /      `-----------------------'                        
   (   -.  |                               
   |     ) |                               
  (`-.  '--.)                              
   `. )----'