From: David Andreas Alderud
Subject: Compiling GCL with mingw32msvc
Date:
Message-ID: <8oouej$ahu$1@news.lth.se>
I'm wondering if anyone have experience compiling GCL with mingw32msvc. I'm
fine using cLISP on WinNT but I would prefer getting GCL to run under it so
that I can use the same LISP environment as I do in FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
If anyone can point me to a precomiled version for WindowsNT/2k it would be
great, though I would prefer to compile the thing myself(for various
reasons).
/Kind redards,
D.A. Alderud
>>>>> "David" == David Andreas Alderud <·······@removethispart.student.vxu.se> writes:
David> I'm wondering if anyone have experience compiling GCL with mingw32msvc. I'm
David> fine using cLISP on WinNT but I would prefer getting GCL to run under it so
David> that I can use the same LISP environment as I do in FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
Why not get Clisp on FreeBSD and OpenBSD? (I think clisp works
there.)
Ray
From: David Andreas Alderud
Subject: Re: Compiling GCL with mingw32msvc
Date:
Message-ID: <8opf08$f3h$1@news.lth.se>
Because I enjoy getting the features of GCL, it integrates well with GCC.
/Kind regards,
D.A. Alderud
>>>>> "David" == David Andreas Alderud <·······@removethispart.student.vxu.se> writes:
David> Because I enjoy getting the features of GCL, it integrates well with GCC.
Good enough for me. You just mentioned wanting the same lisp on
several platforms, and Clisp helps there.
What features of GCL do you enjoy getting? (Just curious.) And how
does gcl integrate well with GCC other than the fact that gcl compiles
code to C and runs the C compiler afterwards (which makes it the
slowest Lisp compiler I've ever used)?
Ray
From: David Andreas Alderud
Subject: Re: Compiling GCL with mingw32msvc
Date:
Message-ID: <8p7crj$lb$1@news.lth.se>
> Good enough for me. You just mentioned wanting the same lisp on
> several platforms, and Clisp helps there.
Yeah, I and I do run cLISP most of them, but I want GCL for one reason, and
one reason only.
> What features of GCL do you enjoy getting? (Just curious.) And how
> does gcl integrate well with GCC other than the fact that gcl compiles
> code to C and runs the C compiler afterwards (which makes it the
> slowest Lisp compiler I've ever used)?
That's exactly the feature I want. :)
Speed is not an issue, I just to be able to get C code if I chose too.
/Kind regards,
David A. Alderud