From: - John of Arc -
Subject: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <4A35F368CA3CB377.647FC0AF0C771E60.965A2E1881C8F06A@lp.airnews.net>
What (free) 32-bit LISP is recommended to run on NT and the other 32-bit
windows?

From: Dr Nick Levine
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <38E06F11.81497C0B@beta.csd.anglia.ac.uk>
- John of Arc - wrote:
> 
> What (free) 32-bit LISP is recommended to run on NT and the other 32-bit
> windows?

There are several offerings, all of them good. Visit

	http://www.lisp.org/table/systems.htm#free

for a list.

- n
From: Sam Steingold
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <uvh27qb1e.fsf@ksp.com>
>>>> In message <··················································@lp.airnews.net>
>>>> On the subject of "LISP for windows and NT?"
>>>> Sent on Mon, 27 Mar 2000 22:33:50 -0600
>>>> Honorable "- John of Arc -" <···@666.666> writes:
 >> What (free) 32-bit LISP is recommended to run on NT and the other

where do you look for GNU software?
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/clisp.README

(do `ls *lisp*` in the pub/gnu directory)

 >> 32-bit windows?

http://clisp.cons.org

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds)
Micros**t is not the answer.  Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
(http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org) generation.
Yeah, yeah, I love cats too... wanna trade recipes?
From: - John of Arc -
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <E0AAE156794A7F34.BBD16C89C4AA82DB.C11E3DF90B24313E@lp.airnews.net>
thanks everyone for all the responses.

Any pointers on picking up LISP, good books, sites, anything on AI, would
also be appreciated.


Sam Steingold <···@gnu.org> wrote in message ··················@ksp.com...
> >>>> In message
<··················································@lp.airnews.net>
> >>>> On the subject of "LISP for windows and NT?"
> >>>> Sent on Mon, 27 Mar 2000 22:33:50 -0600
> >>>> Honorable "- John of Arc -" <···@666.666> writes:
>  >> What (free) 32-bit LISP is recommended to run on NT and the other
>
> where do you look for GNU software?
> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/clisp.README
>
> (do `ls *lisp*` in the pub/gnu directory)
>
>  >> 32-bit windows?
>
> http://clisp.cons.org
>
> --
> Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds)
> Micros**t is not the answer.  Micros**t is a question, and the answer is
Linux,
> (http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org)
generation.
> Yeah, yeah, I love cats too... wanna trade recipes?
From: Andrew Cooke
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <8bplvh$3b9$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Check out www.lisp.org for a list.  Corman Lisp includes
windows-specific code (ie WIN32 api interfaces) (I've not used Corman
Lisp, but am downloading it as I type this because it looks as though it
may be faster and have better GC than CLISP; on the other hand, it looks
like it doesn't have CLOS - but I'm no expert; check www.lisp.org for
full details).

Andrew
http://www.andrewcooke.free-online.co.uk/index.html


In article
<··················································@lp.airnews.net>,
"- John of Arc -" <···············@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What (free) 32-bit LISP is recommended to run on NT and the other
32-bit
> windows?


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
From: Andrew Cooke
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <8bpmqf$40i$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
In article <············@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Andrew Cooke <······@andrewcooke.free-online.co.uk> wrote:
> Check out www.lisp.org for a list. Corman Lisp includes
> windows-specific code (ie WIN32 api interfaces) (I've not used Corman
> Lisp, but am downloading it as I type this because it looks as though
it
> may be faster and have better GC than CLISP; on the other hand, it
looks
> like it doesn't have CLOS - but I'm no expert; check www.lisp.org for
> full details).

Correction - Corman Lisp is a Common Lisp implementation (the full name
is Corman Common Lisp) and it does have CLOS.  At least, when I type
defgeneric into the IDE it pops up a little help box... :-)

Apologies,
Andrew


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
From: Andrew Cooke
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <8bpoon$61e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
In article <············@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Andrew Cooke <······@andrewcooke.free-online.co.uk> wrote:
> Correction - Corman Lisp is a Common Lisp implementation (the full
name
> is Corman Common Lisp) and it does have CLOS. At least, when I type
> defgeneric into the IDE it pops up a little help box... :-)

In fact, it's a closette (the code given in AMOP, more-or-less)
according to the docs.  I should have given a pointer to www.lisp.com
and shut up.  Now I must do some real work....

Andrew


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
From: Thom Goodsell
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <38E0C2BE.EDDA3847@cra.com>
Andrew Cooke wrote:
> In fact, it's a closette (the code given in AMOP, more-or-less)
> according to the docs.  I should have given a pointer to www.lisp.com
> and shut up.  Now I must do some real work....
> 

That would be www.lisp.org.  :)

Thom
From: Chris Double
Subject: Re: LISP for windows and NT?
Date: 
Message-ID: <wkn1nj4ino.fsf@double.co.nz>
Andrew Cooke <······@andrewcooke.free-online.co.uk> writes:

> Correction - Corman Lisp is a Common Lisp implementation (the full
> name is Corman Common Lisp) and it does have CLOS.  At least, when I
> type defgeneric into the IDE it pops up a little help box... :-)

The CLOS is not quite a full CLOS but it's getting there. It's based
on the Closette implementation with changes by Roger Corman. Overall I
like Corman Lisp for it's small size and ease of interfacing with
foreign functions (like the Windows API).

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/cl